From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: kan.liang@linux.intel.com, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
wangnan0@huawei.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] perf trace: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 10:03:39 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180305130339.GE30054@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180302233022.GB8970@krava>
Em Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 12:30:22AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:08:59PM -0500, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > The perf trace still use the legacy interface.
> >
> > Apply the new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for perf trace.
> >
> > No functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 11 +++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > index e7f1b18..a46644f 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > @@ -2472,8 +2472,14 @@ static int trace__run(struct trace *trace, int argc, const char **argv)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < evlist->nr_mmaps; i++) {
> > union perf_event *event;
> > + struct perf_mmap *md;
> > + u64 end, start;
> >
> > - while ((event = perf_evlist__mmap_read(evlist, i)) != NULL) {
> > + md = &evlist->mmap[i];
> > + if (perf_mmap__read_init(md, 0, &start, &end) < 0)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + while ((event = perf_mmap__read_event(md, 0, &start, end)) != NULL) {
> > struct perf_sample sample;
> >
> > ++trace->nr_events;
> > @@ -2486,7 +2492,7 @@ static int trace__run(struct trace *trace, int argc, const char **argv)
> >
> > trace__handle_event(trace, event, &sample);
> > next_event:
> > - perf_evlist__mmap_consume(evlist, i);
> > + perf_mmap__consume(md, 0);
>
> could you call this with 'false' instead of 0, it's 'bool overwrite'
> applies also to the rest of the patchset
I'm doing this, the argument is 'bool', so the value should be false or
true, even '0' being way shorter...
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-05 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-01 23:08 [PATCH 01/14] perf kvm: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface kan.liang
2018-03-01 23:08 ` [PATCH 02/14] perf trace: " kan.liang
2018-03-02 23:30 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-03-05 14:28 ` Liang, Kan
2018-03-02 23:30 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-03-05 13:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2018-03-05 13:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-03-05 14:50 ` Liang, Kan
2018-03-05 15:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-03-06 6:47 ` [tip:perf/core] perf trace: Switch to " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-01 23:09 ` [PATCH 03/14] perf python: Apply " kan.liang
2018-03-06 6:47 ` [tip:perf/core] perf python: Switch to " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-01 23:09 ` [PATCH 04/14] perf test: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for bpf kan.liang
2018-03-06 6:48 ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Switch to " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-01 23:09 ` [PATCH 05/14] perf test: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for code reading kan.liang
2018-03-06 6:48 ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Switch to new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for 'code reading' test tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-01 23:09 ` [PATCH 06/14] perf test: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for keep_tracking kan.liang
2018-03-06 6:49 ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Switch to new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for "keep tracking" test tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-01 23:09 ` [PATCH 07/14] perf test: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for mmap-basic kan.liang
2018-03-06 6:49 ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Switch to " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-01 23:09 ` [PATCH 08/14] perf test: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for tp fields kan.liang
2018-03-06 6:50 ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Switch to " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-01 23:09 ` [PATCH 09/14] perf test: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for perf-record kan.liang
2018-03-06 6:50 ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Switch to " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-01 23:09 ` [PATCH 10/14] perf test: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for time-to-tsc kan.liang
2018-03-06 6:51 ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Switch to " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-01 23:09 ` [PATCH 11/14] perf test: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for sw-clock kan.liang
2018-03-06 6:51 ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Switch to " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-01 23:09 ` [PATCH 12/14] perf test: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for switch-tracking kan.liang
2018-03-06 6:52 ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Switch to " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-01 23:09 ` [PATCH 13/14] perf test: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for task-exit kan.liang
2018-03-06 6:52 ` [tip:perf/core] perf test: Switch to " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-01 23:09 ` [PATCH 14/14] perf tools: Discard legacy interfaces for mmap read forward kan.liang
2018-03-06 6:52 ` [tip:perf/core] perf mmap: " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-06 6:47 ` [tip:perf/core] perf kvm: Switch to new perf_mmap__read_event() interface tip-bot for Kan Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180305130339.GE30054@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox