From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 6/7] sched: idle: Predict idle duration before stopping the tick
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:50:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180305165052.GE25181@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c051023-312b-d2bc-34b5-40e8c13ca796@tu-dresden.de>
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:36:20PM +0100, Thomas Ilsche wrote:
> I fear that might even create positive feedback loops on the
> heuristic, which will take into account the sleep durations for
> sched tick wakeups in sort of a self fulfilling prophecy:
> 1) The heuristic predicts to wake up in less than a full sched period,
> 2) The sched tick is kept enabled
> 3) The sched tick wakes up the system in less than a full sched period
> 4) Repeat
Right, I pointed out this same issue. We should ignore 'ticks' for the
purpose of measuring sleep duration.
That's slightly tricky to actually do though :/
> Question: Does disabling a timer on a cpu guarantee that this cpu will
> wake-up or is there a scenario where a timer is deleted or moved
> externally without the cpu having a chance to change it's idle state?
I think we let them sleep and don't modify any hardware timers,
resulting in them waking up at the predetermined time, not find anything
to do, recompute the next timer and go back to sleep.
Waking them up to reprogram the timer hardware is far more expensive.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-05 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-04 22:21 [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/7] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-04 22:24 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/7] time: tick-sched: Reorganize idle tick management code Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-05 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-05 11:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-04 22:24 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/7] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-04 22:24 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 3/7] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick before cpuidle_idle_call() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-04 22:26 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 4/7] cpuidle: menu: Split idle duration prediction from state selection Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-05 11:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-05 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-05 12:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-05 13:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-05 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-06 2:15 ` Li, Aubrey
2018-03-06 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-06 14:07 ` Li, Aubrey
2018-03-04 22:27 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 5/7] cpuidle: New governor callback for predicting idle duration Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-04 22:28 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 6/7] sched: idle: Predict idle duration before stopping the tick Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-05 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-05 11:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-05 12:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-05 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-05 13:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-05 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-05 12:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-05 13:19 ` Rik van Riel
2018-03-05 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-05 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-05 15:36 ` Thomas Ilsche
2018-03-05 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-03-05 23:27 ` Rik van Riel
2018-03-06 8:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-04 22:29 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 7/7] time: tick-sched: Avoid running the same code twice in a row Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180305165052.GE25181@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgalbraith@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox