From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932741AbeCEXQF (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2018 18:16:05 -0500 Received: from LGEAMRELO13.lge.com ([156.147.23.53]:33161 "EHLO lgeamrelo13.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752936AbeCEXQD (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2018 18:16:03 -0500 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.125 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@kernel.org X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.227.17 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@kernel.org Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:16:00 +0900 From: Namhyung Kim To: Jiri Olsa Cc: "Du, Changbin" , acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] perf sched map: re-annotate shortname if thread comm changed Message-ID: <20180305231600.GB8824@sejong> References: <1519386040-25874-1-git-send-email-changbin.du@intel.com> <20180302105254.234axj7b3nixakav@intel.com> <20180302113845.GC16348@krava> <20180302144732.GA2471@danjae.aot.lge.com> <20180305071136.qs3lsoh432mzbizw@intel.com> <20180305223754.GB7403@krava> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180305223754.GB7403@krava> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 11:37:54PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 03:11:36PM +0800, Du, Changbin wrote: > > SNIP > > > > > on the other hand it's simple enough and looks > > > > like generic solution would be more tricky > > > > > > What about adding perf_sched__process_comm() to set it in the > > > thread::priv? > > > > > I can be done, then thread->comm_changed moves to thread_runtime->comm_changed. > > Draft code as below. It is also a little tricky. > > > > +int perf_sched__process_comm(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused, > > + union perf_event *event, > > + struct perf_sample *sample, > > + struct machine *machine) > > +{ > > + struct thread *thread; > > + struct thread_runtime *r; > > + > > + perf_event__process_comm(tool, event, sample, machine); > > + > > + thread = machine__findnew_thread(machine, pid, tid); > > should you use machine__find_thread in here? Yep, perf_event__process_comm() already created a new thread if needed. And the return value of it should be checked. > > > + if (thread) { > > + r = thread__priv(thread); > > + if (r) > > + r->comm_changed = true; > > + thread__put(thread); > > + } Missing return. > > +} > > + > > static int perf_sched__read_events(struct perf_sched *sched) > > { > > const struct perf_evsel_str_handler handlers[] = { > > @@ -3291,7 +3311,7 @@ int cmd_sched(int argc, const char **argv) > > struct perf_sched sched = { > > .tool = { > > .sample = perf_sched__process_tracepoint_sample, > > - .comm = perf_event__process_comm, > > + .comm = perf_sched__process_comm, > > > > > > But I'd keep 'comm_changed' where 'shortname' is defined. I think they should appears > > togother. And 'shortname' is only used by sched command, too. > > they can both go to struct thread_runtime then Agreed. > > > > > So I still prefer my privous simpler change. Thanks! > > I was wrong thinking that the amount of code > making it sched specific would be biger > > we're trying to keep the core structs generic, > so this one fits better Right. Thanks, Namhyung