From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bcrl@kvack.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, kent.overstreet@gmail.com,
security@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] HMM: Remove superflous RCU protection around radix tree lookup
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 12:59:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180306175948.GA4791@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180306173316.3088458-4-tj@kernel.org>
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 09:33:13AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> hmm_devmem_find() requires rcu_read_lock_held() but there's nothing
> which actually uses the RCU protection. The only caller is
> hmm_devmem_pages_create() which already grabs the mutex and does
> superflous rcu_read_lock/unlock() around the function.
>
> This doesn't add anything and just adds to confusion. Remove the RCU
> protection and open-code the radix tree lookup. If this needs to
> become more sophisticated in the future, let's add them back when
> necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> Hello, Jérôme.
>
> This came up while auditing percpu_ref users for missing explicit RCU
> grace periods. HMM doesn't seem to depend on RCU protection at all,
> so I thought it'd be better to remove it for now. It's only compile
> tested.
Good catch some left over of old logic. I have more cleanup queued up
now that i am about to post nouveau patches to use all this. Thanks for
fixing this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> mm/hmm.c | 12 ++----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 320545b98..d4627c5 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -845,13 +845,6 @@ static void hmm_devmem_release(struct device *dev, void *data)
> hmm_devmem_radix_release(resource);
> }
>
> -static struct hmm_devmem *hmm_devmem_find(resource_size_t phys)
> -{
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> -
> - return radix_tree_lookup(&hmm_devmem_radix, phys >> PA_SECTION_SHIFT);
> -}
> -
> static int hmm_devmem_pages_create(struct hmm_devmem *devmem)
> {
> resource_size_t key, align_start, align_size, align_end;
> @@ -892,9 +885,8 @@ static int hmm_devmem_pages_create(struct hmm_devmem *devmem)
> for (key = align_start; key <= align_end; key += PA_SECTION_SIZE) {
> struct hmm_devmem *dup;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - dup = hmm_devmem_find(key);
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + dup = radix_tree_lookup(&hmm_devmem_radix,
> + key >> PA_SECTION_SHIFT);
> if (dup) {
> dev_err(device, "%s: collides with mapping for %s\n",
> __func__, dev_name(dup->device));
> --
> 2.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-06 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-06 17:26 [PATCHSET] percpu_ref, RCU: Audit RCU usages in percpu_ref users Tejun Heo
2018-03-06 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] fs/aio: Add explicit RCU grace period when freeing kioctx Tejun Heo
2018-03-06 17:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] fs/aio: Use RCU accessors for kioctx_table->table[] Tejun Heo
2018-03-06 17:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] RDMAVT: Fix synchronization around percpu_ref Tejun Heo
2018-03-07 15:39 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2018-03-06 17:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] HMM: Remove superflous RCU protection around radix tree lookup Tejun Heo
2018-03-06 17:59 ` Jerome Glisse [this message]
2018-03-06 17:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] block: Remove superflous rcu_read_[un]lock_sched() in blk_queue_enter() Tejun Heo
2018-03-06 17:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-14 18:46 ` tj
2018-03-14 20:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-14 20:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-14 20:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-06 17:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] percpu_ref: Update doc to dissuade users from depending on internal RCU grace periods Tejun Heo
2018-03-06 17:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] RCU, workqueue: Implement rcu_work Tejun Heo
2018-03-06 18:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-09 15:37 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-07 2:49 ` Lai Jiangshan
2018-03-07 14:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-07 16:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-07 17:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-08 0:29 ` Lai Jiangshan
2018-03-08 17:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-09 16:21 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180306175948.GA4791@redhat.com \
--to=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).