From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 1/6] time: tick-sched: Reorganize idle tick management code
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 00:18:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180307231827.GA9367@lerouge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4136227.b9g9WnMbNJ@aspire.rjw.lan>
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:02:01AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Index: linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +
> +/**
> + * tick_nohz_idle_prepare - prepare for entering idle on the current CPU.
> + *
> + * Called when we start the idle loop.
> + */
> +void tick_nohz_idle_prepare(void)
> +{
> + struct tick_sched *ts;
> +
> + __tick_nohz_idle_prepare();
> +
> + local_irq_disable();
> +
> + ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
> + ts->inidle = 1;
> +
> + local_irq_enable();
> +}
Why not calling tick_nohz_start_idle() from there? This is going to
simplify the rest, you won't need to call tick_nohz_idle_go_idle()
from places that don't want to stop the tick and you can then remove
the stop_tick argument.
> +
> +/**
> + * tick_nohz_idle_go_idle - start idle period on the current CPU.
> + * @stop_tick: Whether or not to stop the idle tick.
> + *
> + * When @stop_tick is set and the next event is more than a tick into the
> + * future, stop the idle tick.
> + */
> +void tick_nohz_idle_go_idle(bool stop_tick)
> +{
> + __tick_nohz_idle_enter(this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched), stop_tick);
> +}
> +
> +void tick_nohz_idle_enter(void)
> +{
> + struct tick_sched *ts;
> +
> + __tick_nohz_idle_prepare();
>
> local_irq_disable();
>
> ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
> ts->inidle = 1;
> - __tick_nohz_idle_enter(ts);
> + __tick_nohz_idle_enter(ts, true);
>
> local_irq_enable();
> }
Ah I see you're keeping tick_nohz_idle_enter() around because of the callsite
in xen. It looks like a hack (from the xen part), I'll need to have a look at
it, just a note for myself...
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-07 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-06 8:57 [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/6] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-06 9:02 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 1/6] time: tick-sched: Reorganize idle tick management code Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-07 23:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2018-03-08 9:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-08 15:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-08 16:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-08 17:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-06 9:02 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 2/6] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-07 23:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-03-08 9:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-06 9:03 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 3/6] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick before cpuidle_idle_call() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-06 9:05 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 4/6] cpuidle: Return nohz hint from cpuidle_select() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-06 9:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-06 10:06 ` [Update][RFC/RFT][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-06 9:10 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 5/6] sched: idle: Select idle state before stopping the tick Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-06 9:10 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 6/6] time: tick-sched: Avoid running the same code twice in a row Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-08 10:31 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH v2 0/6] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework Mike Galbraith
2018-03-08 11:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-08 13:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-03-09 9:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180307231827.GA9367@lerouge \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgalbraith@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).