From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S965433AbeCHKhK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 8 Mar 2018 05:37:10 -0500
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:35698 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S934059AbeCHKhI (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 8 Mar 2018 05:37:08 -0500
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:37:03 +0000
From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>, Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] sched/fair: update util_est only on util_avg
 updates
Message-ID: <20180308103703.GG2211@e110439-lin>
References: <20180222170153.673-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
 <20180222170153.673-5-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
 <20180308094830.GK25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180308094830.GK25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 08-Mar 10:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 05:01:53PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > +#define UTIL_EST_NEED_UPDATE_FLAG 0x1
> 
> > @@ -5321,12 +5345,19 @@ static inline void util_est_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> >  	if (!task_sleep)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Skip update of task's estimated utilization if the PELT signal has
> > +	 * never been updated (at least once) since last enqueue time.
> > +	 */
> > +	ue = READ_ONCE(p->se.avg.util_est);
> > +	if (ue.enqueued & UTIL_EST_NEED_UPDATE_FLAG)
> > +		return;
> 
> The name and function seem inverted, if the flag is set, we do _NOT_
> update util_est.

My reading was along the line "when the flag is set we need an
update of util_avg to collect a new util_est sample"...

... but I agree that's confusing... and unnecessary long.

> How about something like UTIL_EST_UNCHANGED ? That would give:

I would prefer UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED, since the flags is reset when we
have a change in util_avg, thus enabling util_est updates.

> 	/*
> 	 * If the PELT values haven't changed since enqueue time,
> 	 * skip the util_est update.
> 	 */
> 	if (enqueue & UTIL_EST_UNCHANGED)
> 		return;

-- 
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi