From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] driver core: check notifier_call_chain return value
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:10:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180315171059.GA10254@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180227140926.22996-2-benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:09:24PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> When being notified that a driver is about to be bind a listener
> could return NOTIFY_BAD.
> Check the return to be sure that the driver could be bind.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/dd.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index de6fd092bf2f..9275f2c0fed2 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -304,9 +304,12 @@ static int driver_sysfs_add(struct device *dev)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (dev->bus)
> - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&dev->bus->p->bus_notifier,
> - BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER, dev);
> + if (dev->bus) {
> + if (blocking_notifier_call_chain(&dev->bus->p->bus_notifier,
> + BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER, dev) ==
> + NOTIFY_BAD)
> + return -EINVAL;
checkpatch does not complain about this?
And what is going to break when we enable this, as we have never checked
this before?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-15 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-27 14:09 [PATCH 0/3] STM32 Extended TrustZone Protection driver Benjamin Gaignard
2018-02-27 14:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] driver core: check notifier_call_chain return value Benjamin Gaignard
2018-03-15 17:10 ` Greg KH [this message]
2018-03-16 8:53 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2018-02-27 14:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: stm32: Add bindings for Extended TrustZone Protection Benjamin Gaignard
2018-02-27 14:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: mach-stm32: Add Extended TrustZone Protection driver Benjamin Gaignard
2018-02-27 17:14 ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-27 19:23 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2018-02-27 17:11 ` [PATCH 0/3] STM32 " Mark Rutland
2018-02-27 19:16 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2018-02-27 19:46 ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-28 7:53 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2018-02-28 17:53 ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-28 18:32 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180315171059.GA10254@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@st.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox