From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] x86/dumpstack: Save first regs set for the executive summary
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:01:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180315190132.2d653yu7ezf2zplh@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180315154448.16222-9-bp@alien8.de>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 04:44:47PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> @@ -321,6 +323,9 @@ void oops_end(unsigned long flags, struct pt_regs *regs, int signr)
> raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> oops_exit();
>
> + /* Executive summary in case the oops scrolled away */
> + __show_regs(&exec_summary_regs, false);
> +
no_context() has the following line, right before it calls oops_end():
/* Executive summary in case the body of the oops scrolled away */
printk(KERN_DEFAULT "CR2: %016lx\n", address);
I think that line can now be removed, since the executive summary
__show_regs() will include CR2.
> @@ -352,26 +357,14 @@ int __die(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, long err)
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION) ?
> (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI) ? " PTI" : " NOPTI") : "");
>
> + show_regs(regs);
> +
> if (notify_die(DIE_OOPS, str, regs, err,
> current->thread.trap_nr, SIGSEGV) == NOTIFY_STOP)
> return 1;
>
> print_modules();
> - show_regs(regs);
Was moving the show_regs() call intentional? I didn't see it mentioned
in the changelog.
> @@ -410,7 +403,5 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> if (regs->ip < PAGE_OFFSET)
> pr_cont(" Bad RIP value.\n");
> - else
> - show_opcodes((u8 *)regs->ip, KERN_DEFAULT);
> }
> }
Doesn't this hunk belong in the previous patch, which added the
__show_regs -> show_ip() -> show_opcodes() call path?
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-15 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-15 15:44 [PATCH 0/9] x86/dumpstack: Cleanups and user opcode bytes Code: section, v2 Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/dumstack: Remove code_bytes Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 18:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/dumpstack: Unexport oops_begin() Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/dumpstack: Carve out Code: dumping into a function Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/dumpstack: Improve opcodes dumping in the Code: section Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 18:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 18:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 19:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 11:57 ` David Laight
2018-03-15 18:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 18:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/dumpstack: Add loglevel argument to show_opcodes() Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/fault: Dump user opcode bytes on fatal faults Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/dumpstack: Add a show_ip() function Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 18:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 18:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/dumpstack: Save first regs set for the executive summary Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 19:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2018-03-16 11:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-16 12:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 12:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-16 13:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 13:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-16 17:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-16 17:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 17:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-16 18:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/dumpstack: Explain the reasoning for the prologue and buffer size Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 18:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 18:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 17:51 ` [PATCH 0/9] x86/dumpstack: Cleanups and user opcode bytes Code: section, v2 Linus Torvalds
2018-04-17 14:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 20:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-04-17 21:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-18 13:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-17 16:11 [PATCH 0/9] x86/dumpstack: Cleanups and user opcode bytes Code: section, v3 Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 16:11 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/dumpstack: Save first regs set for the executive summary Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180315190132.2d653yu7ezf2zplh@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox