public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Francis Deslauriers <francis.deslauriers@efficios.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kprobe: fix: Add ftrace_ops_assist_func to kprobe blacklist
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 16:57:50 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180317165750.3bb30290b2bb47a3052b2700@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180316230154.2d34a98c@vmware.local.home>

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:01:54 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 10:22:11 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Or, we can check it by ftrace_location_range() as below patch.
> 
> Cute ;-)
> 
> > 
> > Note that as a side-effect, we can not trace functions in trace_kprobe.c
> > anymore, and this means it is hard to me to make a testcase of kprobe events.
> > It was the easiest (and maintainable) way to make test cases... sigh.
> > 
> > -----
> > tracing: kprobes: Prohibit probing on notrace function
> > 
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Prohibit kprobe-events probing on notrace function.
> > Since probing on the notrace function can cause recursive
> > event call. In most case those are just skipped, but
> > in some case it falls into infinit recursive call.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> > index 5ce9b8cf7be3..7404b012e51a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> > @@ -487,6 +487,23 @@ disable_trace_kprobe(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct trace_event_file *file)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> > +static bool within_notrace_func(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long offset, size, addr;
> > +
> > +	addr = kallsyms_lookup_name(trace_kprobe_symbol(tk));
> > +	addr += trace_kprobe_offset(tk);
> > +
> > +	if (!kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(addr, &size, &offset))
> > +		return true;	/* Out of range. */
> > +
> > +	return !ftrace_location_range(addr - offset, addr - offset + size);
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +#define within_notrace_func(tk)	(false)
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  /* Internal register function - just handle k*probes and flags */
> >  static int __register_trace_kprobe(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> >  {
> > @@ -495,6 +512,12 @@ static int __register_trace_kprobe(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> >  	if (trace_probe_is_registered(&tk->tp))
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > +	if (within_notrace_func(tk)) {
> > +		pr_warn("Could not probe notrace function %s\n",
> > +			trace_kprobe_symbol(tk));
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> 
> This will prevent probing assembly code. Do we want to do that? Or is
> kprobes already prohibited from doing so?

No, kprobes itself can probe any assembly code except for the area where
can cause recursive hit as I explained. So anyway we still need to
mark those functions NOKPROBE_SYMBOL.

And note that this just prevent to probe those notrace code *via kprobe_events*
interface. So pure kprobe user (like systemtap) is not effected by this change.

So, maybe we would better to provide another debug knob which skips above check.
This is only for non-experienced admins :)

Thanks,

> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> > +
> >  	for (i = 0; i < tk->tp.nr_args; i++)
> >  		traceprobe_update_arg(&tk->tp.args[i]);
> >  
> > 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-17  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-14 14:58 [PATCH 0/2] kprobe: Fix: add symbols to kprobe blacklist Francis Deslauriers
2017-07-14 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] kprobe: fix: Add _ASM_NOKPROBE to x86 apic interrupt macro Francis Deslauriers
2017-07-14 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] kprobe: fix: Add ftrace_ops_assist_func to kprobe blacklist Francis Deslauriers
2017-07-14 18:29   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-16 15:18     ` Francis Deslauriers
2018-03-16 15:25       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-16 16:28         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-03-16 16:41           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-16 16:48             ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-16 17:53               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-03-16 19:02                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-17  0:13                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-17  1:22                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-17  3:01                     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-17  7:57                       ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2018-07-03 22:30                     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 19:34                       ` Francis Deslauriers
2018-07-11 19:56                         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  0:40                           ` Francis Deslauriers
2018-07-12 13:59                             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-07-12 13:46                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-17  0:08           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-07-12 17:54   ` [PATCH 0/2] tracing: kprobes: Prohibit probing on notrace functions Francis Deslauriers
2018-07-12 17:54     ` [PATCH 1/2] " Francis Deslauriers
2018-07-12 21:49       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-13  2:53       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-07-13 12:18         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-26  0:41           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-07-26  1:13             ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 17:54     ` [PATCH 2/2] selftest/ftrace: Move kprobe selftest function to separate compile unit Francis Deslauriers
2017-07-14 18:27 ` [PATCH 0/2] kprobe: Fix: add symbols to kprobe blacklist Steven Rostedt
2017-07-16 15:59   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-07-16 14:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-07-16 15:46   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-07-17 18:46     ` Francis Deslauriers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180317165750.3bb30290b2bb47a3052b2700@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=francis.deslauriers@efficios.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox