From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751824AbeCZLxh (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:53:37 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39950 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751134AbeCZLxg (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:53:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:53:46 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Suzuki K Poulose Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.martin@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, jnair@caviumnetworks.com, ckadabi@codeaurora.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, shankerd@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/22] arm64: Rework cpu capabilities handling Message-ID: <20180326115345.GA8464@arm.com> References: <20180313115120.17256-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180313115120.17256-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Suzuki, On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:50:58AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > This series reworks the arm64 CPU capabilities handling (which > manages the system features and errata). The current infrastructure > doesn't allow fine control for handling different features or errata. > There is one rule for features and another rule for errata. Please can you repost this based on top of for-next/core and with Dave's acks added? Thanks, Will