* [PATCH] watchdog: wafer5823wdt: Mark expected switch fall-through
@ 2018-03-27 19:33 Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-03-27 21:05 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2018-03-27 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wim Van Sebroeck, Guenter Roeck
Cc: linux-watchdog, linux-kernel, Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
"Fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c
index db0da7e..93c5b61 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static long wafwdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
timeout = new_timeout;
wafwdt_stop();
wafwdt_start();
- /* Fall */
+ /* Fall through */
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
return put_user(timeout, p);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] watchdog: wafer5823wdt: Mark expected switch fall-through
2018-03-27 19:33 [PATCH] watchdog: wafer5823wdt: Mark expected switch fall-through Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2018-03-27 21:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-03-27 21:14 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2018-03-27 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo A. R. Silva, Wim Van Sebroeck; +Cc: linux-watchdog, linux-kernel
On 03/27/2018 12:33 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
> "Fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c
> index db0da7e..93c5b61 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/wafer5823wdt.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static long wafwdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> timeout = new_timeout;
> wafwdt_stop();
> wafwdt_start();
> - /* Fall */
> + /* Fall through */
> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> return put_user(timeout, p);
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] watchdog: wafer5823wdt: Mark expected switch fall-through
2018-03-27 21:05 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2018-03-27 21:14 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2018-03-27 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck, Wim Van Sebroeck; +Cc: linux-watchdog, linux-kernel
On 03/27/2018 04:05 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 03/27/2018 12:33 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
>> "Fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>
Thanks, Guenter.
--
Gustavo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-03-27 21:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-03-27 19:33 [PATCH] watchdog: wafer5823wdt: Mark expected switch fall-through Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-03-27 21:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-03-27 21:14 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox