From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Manoj Gupta <manojgupta@chromium.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs: Check return value of debugfs_real_fops() for NULL
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:34:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180328153454.ejpn2ayppkk3escc@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180328153051.jlyqpz7dxcuxgawc@treble>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:30:51AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 07:47:53AM -0700, Manoj Gupta wrote:
> > Please note that there is nothing wrong in the generated code, just
> > that it confuses objtool.
> > Clang has simply omitted the statement where NULL is returned since
> > the pointer was always dereferenced post inlining.
>
> ... but returning NULL would be far more sane than falling through to
> the next function.
Or, as the case may be, oopsing at the point of failure.
> > Note that GCC will also remove the NULL pointers if it knows that the
> > pointer is dereferenced.
> > Here is an example.
> >
> > void null_check(int *P) {
> > int deref = *P;
> > if (P == 0) // GCC won't check the condition.
> > return;
> > *P = 4;
> > }
> >
> > Compiling with gcc -O2 gives:
> > movl $4, (%rdi)
> > ret
>
> This is why we use -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks.
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-28 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-27 23:55 [PATCH] debugfs: Check return value of debugfs_real_fops() for NULL Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-03-28 6:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-03-28 14:47 ` Manoj Gupta
2018-03-28 15:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-28 15:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2018-03-28 18:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-03-28 18:14 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-03-28 18:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-03-28 18:50 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-03-28 19:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180328153454.ejpn2ayppkk3escc@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manojgupta@chromium.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox