From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: "Ganesh Mahendran" <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Joe Perches" <joe@perches.com>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@google.com>,
"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ANDROID: binder: change down_write to down_read
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 12:04:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180330100407.GB19140@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180330012921.GB255979@rodete-desktop-imager.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:29:21AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Ganesh,
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:21:55AM +0800, Ganesh Mahendran wrote:
> > 2018-03-29 14:54 GMT+08:00 Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>:
> > > binder_update_page_range needs down_write of mmap_sem because
> > > vm_insert_page need to change vma->vm_flags to VM_MIXEDMAP unless
> > > it is set. However, when I profile binder working, it seems
> > > every binder buffers should be mapped in advance by binder_mmap.
> > > It means we could set VM_MIXEDMAP in binder_mmap time which is
> > > already hold a mmap_sem as down_write so binder_update_page_range
> > > doesn't need to hold a mmap_sem as down_write.
> > >
> > > Android suffers from mmap_sem contention so let's reduce mmap_sem
> > > down_write.
> >
> > Hi, Minchan:
> >
> > It seems there is performance regression of this patch.
>
> You mean "This patch aims for solving performance regression" not "This patch
> makes performance regression"?
>
> >
> > Do you have some test result of android app launch time or binderThroughput?
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any number. The goal is to reduce the number of
> call mmap_sem as write-side lock because it makes priority inversion of threads
> easily and that's one of clear part I spot that we don't need write-side lock.
Please always run the binderThroughput tests when making binder changes
(there is a binder test suite in the CTS Android tests), as that ensures
that you are not causing performance regressions as well as just normal
bug regressions :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-30 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-29 6:54 [PATCH v5] ANDROID: binder: change down_write to down_read Minchan Kim
2018-03-30 1:21 ` Ganesh Mahendran
2018-03-30 1:29 ` Minchan Kim
2018-03-30 1:39 ` Ganesh Mahendran
2018-03-30 2:40 ` Minchan Kim
2018-03-30 10:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-04-02 6:34 ` Minchan Kim
2018-04-02 6:46 ` Ganesh Mahendran
2018-04-02 7:11 ` Minchan Kim
2018-04-02 10:01 ` Ganesh Mahendran
2018-04-02 10:32 ` Minchan Kim
2018-04-09 6:40 ` Minchan Kim
2018-04-09 6:50 ` Ganesh Mahendran
2018-04-10 8:52 ` Ganesh Mahendran
2018-04-16 9:17 ` Minchan Kim
2018-04-16 9:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-04-16 9:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-04-16 10:03 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180330100407.GB19140@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=opensource.ganesh@gmail.com \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox