From: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing, printk: Force no hashing when trace_printk() is used
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 07:43:49 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180403214349.GF781@eros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180403170612.7b11fc41@gandalf.local.home>
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 05:06:12PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:07:58 -0700
> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > > Both trace_debug is set and kptr_restrict is set to zero in the same
> > > code that produces the above banner. This will allow trace_printk() to
> > > not be affected by security code, as trace_printk() should never be run
> > > on a machine that needs security of this kind.
> >
> > While I think it'd be nice to have a boot-time knob for this (a debate
> > that was unsuccessful in earlier threads), I remain skeptical of
> > having a _runtime_ knob for this, as then it becomes a target (and
> > yes, there are plenty of targets, but why add another).
> >
> > If this was __ro_after_init, maybe that'd be nicer. CONFIG_TRACING=y
>
> Well, then of course this would need a check to keep modules from
> setting it. But I think I know of a nice alternative.
>
>
> > is used everywhere, so this is really just the whole knob debate over
> > again. Instead, I've been following Linus's distillation of %p usage
> > in the kernel:
> >
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFwQEd_d40g4mUCSsVRZzrFPUJt74vc6PPpb675hYNXcKw@mail.gmail.com
>
> Remember, this isn't a printk() that hangs around for production. I was
> debugging code that modified pointers, and I wanted to make sure that
> the pointer arithmetic was correct (it wasn't), and randomizing the
> output made my prints useless.
>
> If you are concerned about attack surface, I could make it a bit more
> difficult to tweak by malicious software. What about the patch below?
> It would be much more difficult to modify this knob from an attack
> vector.
>
> -- Steve
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h
> index e9b603ee9953..b624493b3991 100644
> --- a/include/linux/printk.h
> +++ b/include/linux/printk.h
> @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ static inline void printk_safe_flush_on_panic(void)
> #endif
>
> extern int kptr_restrict;
> +extern struct static_key trace_debug;
>
> extern asmlinkage void dump_stack(void) __cold;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 0f47e653ffd8..6c151d00848b 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -2864,6 +2864,10 @@ void trace_printk_init_buffers(void)
>
> buffers_allocated = 1;
>
> + /* This is a debug kernel, allow pointers to be shown */
> + static_key_enable(&trace_debug);
> + kptr_restrict = 0;
> +
> /*
> * trace_printk_init_buffers() can be called by modules.
> * If that happens, then we need to start cmdline recording
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> index 89f8a4a4b770..c3d8eafecb39 100644
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -1345,6 +1345,7 @@ char *uuid_string(char *buf, char *end, const u8 *addr,
> }
>
> int kptr_restrict __read_mostly;
> +struct static_key trace_debug = STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE;
>
> static noinline_for_stack
> char *restricted_pointer(char *buf, char *end, const void *ptr,
> @@ -1962,6 +1963,10 @@ char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
> return pointer_string(buf, end, ptr, spec);
> }
>
> + /* When the kernel is in debugging mode, show all pointers */
> + if (static_key_false(&trace_debug))
> + return restricted_pointer(buf, end, ptr, spec);
> +
> /* default is to _not_ leak addresses, hash before printing */
> return ptr_to_id(buf, end, ptr, spec);
> }
This uses the deprecated API Steve (I only know because I went to read
Documentation/static-keys.txt after seeing this patch).
Hope this helps,
Tobin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-03 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-03 19:41 [RFC][PATCH] tracing, printk: Force no hashing when trace_printk() is used Steven Rostedt
2018-04-03 20:07 ` Kees Cook
2018-04-03 21:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-03 21:43 ` Tobin C. Harding [this message]
2018-04-03 22:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-04 7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-04 13:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-04 16:27 ` Kees Cook
2018-04-04 16:52 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180403214349.GF781@eros \
--to=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox