From: Alan Kao <alankao@andestech.com>
To: Alex Solomatnikov <sols@sifive.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>, Albert Ou <albert@sifive.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>,
Greentime Hu <greentime@andestech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf: riscv: Add Document for Future Porting Guide
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 13:09:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180405050938.GB24451@andestech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ2AOiM34QyHPZkpz3DEpkyWB2TJ-gK9qPM3rKc2dNDQXCRXiw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 07:08:43PM -0700, Alex Solomatnikov wrote:
> Doc fixes:
>
>
Thanks for these fixes. I'll edit this patch and send a v3 once I am done
with the PMU patch.
I suppose a "Reviewed-by: Alex Solomatnikov" appending at the end of the
commit will be great, right?
Alan
> diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/pmu.txt b/Documentation/riscv/pmu.txt
> index a3e930e..ae90a5e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/riscv/pmu.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/riscv/pmu.txt
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ the lack of the following general architectural
> performance monitoring features:
> * Enabling/Disabling counters
> Counters are just free-running all the time in our case.
> * Interrupt caused by counter overflow
> - No such design in the spec.
> + No such feature in the spec.
> * Interrupt indicator
> It is not possible to have many interrupt ports for all counters, so an
> interrupt indicator is required for software to tell which counter has
> @@ -159,14 +159,14 @@ interrupt for perf, so the details are to be
> completed in the future.
>
> They seem symmetric but perf treats them quite differently. For reading, there
> is a *read* interface in *struct pmu*, but it serves more than just reading.
> -According to the context, the *read* function not only read the content of the
> -counter (event->count), but also update the left period to the next interrupt
> +According to the context, the *read* function not only reads the content of the
> +counter (event->count), but also updates the left period for the next interrupt
> (event->hw.period_left).
>
> But the core of perf does not need direct write to counters. Writing counters
> -hides behind the abstraction of 1) *pmu->start*, literally start
> counting so one
> +is hidden behind the abstraction of 1) *pmu->start*, literally start
> counting so one
> has to set the counter to a good value for the next interrupt; 2)
> inside the IRQ
> -it should set the counter with the same reason.
> +it should set the counter to the same reasonable value.
>
> Reading is not a problem in RISC-V but writing would need some effort, since
> counters are not allowed to be written by S-mode.
> @@ -190,37 +190,37 @@ Three states (event->hw.state) are defined:
> A normal flow of these state transitions are as follows:
>
> * A user launches a perf event, resulting in calling to *event_init*.
> -* When being context-switched in, *add* is called by the perf core, with flag
> - PERF_EF_START, which mean that the event should be started after it is added.
> - In this stage, an general event is binded to a physical counter, if any.
> +* When being context-switched in, *add* is called by the perf core, with a flag
> + PERF_EF_START, which means that the event should be started after
> it is added.
> + At this stage, a general event is bound to a physical counter, if any.
> The state changes to PERF_HES_STOPPED and PERF_HES_UPTODATE,
> because it is now
> stopped, and the (software) event count does not need updating.
> ** *start* is then called, and the counter is enabled.
> - With flag PERF_EF_RELOAD, it write the counter to an appropriate
> value (check
> - previous section for detail).
> - No writing is made if the flag does not contain PERF_EF_RELOAD.
> - The state now is reset to none, because it is neither stopped nor update
> - (the counting already starts)
> -* When being context-switched out, *del* is called. It then checkout all the
> - events in the PMU and call *stop* to update their counts.
> + With flag PERF_EF_RELOAD, it writes an appropriate value to the
> counter (check
> + the previous section for details).
> + Nothing is written if the flag does not contain PERF_EF_RELOAD.
> + The state now is reset to none, because it is neither stopped nor updated
> + (the counting already started)
> +* When being context-switched out, *del* is called. It then checks out all the
> + events in the PMU and calls *stop* to update their counts.
> ** *stop* is called by *del*
> and the perf core with flag PERF_EF_UPDATE, and it often shares the same
> subroutine as *read* with the same logic.
> The state changes to PERF_HES_STOPPED and PERF_HES_UPTODATE, again.
>
> -** Life cycles of these two pairs: *add* and *del* are called repeatedly as
> +** Life cycle of these two pairs: *add* and *del* are called repeatedly as
> tasks switch in-and-out; *start* and *stop* is also called when the perf core
> needs a quick stop-and-start, for instance, when the interrupt
> period is being
> adjusted.
>
> -Current implementation is sufficient for now and can be easily extend to
> +Current implementation is sufficient for now and can be easily
> extended with new
> features in the future.
>
> A. Related Structures
> ---------------------
>
> -* struct pmu: include/linux/perf_events.h
> -* struct riscv_pmu: arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_events.h
> +* struct pmu: include/linux/perf_event.h
> +* struct riscv_pmu: arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_event.h
>
> Both structures are designed to be read-only.
>
> @@ -231,13 +231,13 @@ perf's internal state machine (check
> kernel/events/core.c for details).
> *struct riscv_pmu* defines PMU-specific parameters. The naming follows the
> convention of all other architectures.
>
> -* struct perf_event: include/linux/perf_events.h
> +* struct perf_event: include/linux/perf_event.h
> * struct hw_perf_event
>
> The generic structure that represents perf events, and the hardware-related
> details.
>
> -* struct riscv_hw_events: arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_events.h
> +* struct riscv_hw_events: arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_event.h
>
> The structure that holds the status of events, has two fixed members:
> the number of events and the array of the events.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-05 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-02 12:31 [PATCH 0/2] perf: riscv: Preliminary Perf Event Support on RISC-V Alan Kao
2018-04-02 12:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf: riscv: preliminary RISC-V support Alan Kao
2018-04-03 1:35 ` Alex Solomatnikov
2018-04-02 12:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf: riscv: Add Document for Future Porting Guide Alan Kao
2018-04-04 2:08 ` Alex Solomatnikov
2018-04-05 5:09 ` Alan Kao [this message]
2018-04-02 12:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] perf: riscv: Preliminary Perf Event Support on RISC-V Alan Kao
2018-04-03 3:15 ` [PATCH " Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180405050938.GB24451@andestech.com \
--to=alankao@andestech.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=albert@sifive.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=greentime@andestech.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nickhu@andestech.com \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sols@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox