* atomic file replacing status?
@ 2018-02-12 6:40 Andrew Kelley
2018-04-06 21:22 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Kelley @ 2018-02-12 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Whatever happened to this patch?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9636735/
It looks fine and addresses a legitimate issue.
Please CC me on replies as I am not subscribed to the LKML.
Kind regards,
Andrew Kelley
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: atomic file replacing status?
2018-02-12 6:40 atomic file replacing status? Andrew Kelley
@ 2018-04-06 21:22 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-04-06 21:30 ` Omar Sandoval
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2018-04-06 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Kelley, Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Omar Sandoval
On 02/11/2018 10:40 PM, Andrew Kelley wrote:
> Whatever happened to this patch?
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9636735/
>
> It looks fine and addresses a legitimate issue.
>
> Please CC me on replies as I am not subscribed to the LKML.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andrew Kelley
There was some discussion and then nothing happened... (AFAICT)
Cc: Omar (patch author) to see what he knows about it.
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: atomic file replacing status?
2018-04-06 21:22 ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2018-04-06 21:30 ` Omar Sandoval
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Omar Sandoval @ 2018-04-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap, Al Viro
Cc: Andrew Kelley, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Omar Sandoval
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:22:06PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 02/11/2018 10:40 PM, Andrew Kelley wrote:
> > Whatever happened to this patch?
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9636735/
> >
> > It looks fine and addresses a legitimate issue.
> >
> > Please CC me on replies as I am not subscribed to the LKML.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Andrew Kelley
>
>
> There was some discussion and then nothing happened... (AFAICT)
>
> Cc: Omar (patch author) to see what he knows about it.
I was going to do my yearly "bug Al about it at LSF/MM" in a couple of
weeks ;)
As far as I know, there weren't any other concerns about v2 (v1 had some
legitimate objections, see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9440605/).
Al, do you have any thoughts on the patch linked above?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-06 21:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-12 6:40 atomic file replacing status? Andrew Kelley
2018-04-06 21:22 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-04-06 21:30 ` Omar Sandoval
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox