From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752163AbeDJSKX (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:10:23 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:45691 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751876AbeDJSKW (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:10:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 20:10:20 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Robin Murphy Cc: Takashi Iwai , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: Fix unexpected swiotlb_alloc_coherent() failures Message-ID: <20180410181020.GA28565@lst.de> References: <20180410170513.22834-1-tiwai@suse.de> <20180410170615.GA27589@lst.de> <40618b9c-786d-7f5f-3f5b-fc1dd8375846@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40618b9c-786d-7f5f-3f5b-fc1dd8375846@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 06:50:04PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > In the first one, the machine appears to have enough RAM that most of it is > beyond the device's 36-bit DMA mask, thus it's fairly likely for the > initial direct alloc to come back with something unsuitable. But we should try a GFP_DMA32 allocation first, so this is a bit surprising.