From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i2c: tda998x: Remove VLA usage
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 23:06:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180410220634.GZ16141@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <855433a0-72f5-df29-3a17-5c2016e988e1@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:52:35PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 04/09/2018 03:21 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 02:07:03PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >>There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs[1] from the kernel to eventually
> >>turn on -Wvla. The vla in reg_write_range is based on the length of data
> >>passed. The one use of a non-constant size for this range is bounded by
> >>the size buffer passed to hdmi_infoframe_pack which is a fixed size.
> >>Switch to this upper bound.
> >
> >Does this _really_ make it safer? What if the code is modified to write
> >more than 32 bytes in the future?
> >
> >Sorry, I don't think this is safer at all.
> >
>
> Yeah I wasn't 100% sure about this one. Elsewhere, we've added bounds
> checks against the new static size buffer so we could do that here
> to ensure we don't overrun the stack if we do need to write more
> than 32 bytes in the future. Another option is to switch to
> a kmalloc buffer. Are either of those options acceptable to you or
> do you have a better idea of how to get rid of the VLA?
Limiting the size would be better (with an error message/WARN_ON) -
at least that results in a diagnostic message to alert the developer
rather than silently stomping over the stack.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-10 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-09 21:07 [PATCH] drm/i2c: tda998x: Remove VLA usage Laura Abbott
2018-04-09 22:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-10 21:52 ` Laura Abbott
2018-04-10 22:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180410220634.GZ16141@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox