public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Simplifying our RCU models
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:44:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180410234425.GA30784@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180308204524.GW3918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 12:45:24PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:48:50AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Paul E. McKenney
> > <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ah, and any thoughts on how best to get feedback from the various people
> > > who would need to reprogram their fingers?  Or is everyone already on
> > > board with changing these various names?
> > 
> > I really would prefer to not see massive re-naming unless there is a
> > really good reason for it.
> > 
> > I'm all for simplifying RCU from a million different versions down to
> > just a few thousand, but I'm definitely not convinced we want to do
> > any search-and-replace.
> 
> I am currently in the design (more accurately, reredesign phase) for
> the simplification.  It is quite possible that there is a good reason
> for at least some renaming, but in that case, I would come back later
> with that as a separate proposal.

And I really am still working on this.  It is a bit tricky, but still
looks doable.  More likely to be ready for 4.19 than 4.18, though.

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-10 23:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAG48ez17vOL0oEWqoqdHCjqfGVX+aPhHBrtgCfn35z6jZ=8-Xg@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <CA+55aFzQPQw2UqQ2EEGN1Xe7=qDs-2VTvHVi7SSqGNwqNRg0cQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <CAOS58YPzLeiZnwEeN31wWMZhki0t9+3ozdRNv9DgxWKY7OKmGA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <CA+55aFx48U4W5tUgqW9ioZOHibPhQoDCUDWF_d-7yNCbqFQ7zg@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <20180305001600.GO3918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     [not found]         ` <CA+55aFyOi1XnSqHtg=VfcUiBL+egNL==NRX1Zaeihe8W5OJVgw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <20180305030949.GP3918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     [not found]             ` <20180305082441.4hao2z4dqn2n5on6@gmail.com>
2018-03-05 14:33               ` Simplifying our RCU models Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-05 16:14                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-06  8:47                   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-06  9:00                     ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-06 21:06                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-06 20:39                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-07 15:54                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-07 18:48                         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-08 20:45                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-10 23:44                             ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-06-08 16:51                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-27 22:28                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 21:47                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-08 21:19                         ` Andrea Parri
     [not found]                           ` <20180309005145.GZ3918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     [not found]                             ` <20180309095520.GA5079@andrea>
     [not found]                               ` <20180310160409.GF3918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                 ` <20180310162946.GA7548@andrea>
     [not found]                                   ` <20180310224726.GI3918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2018-03-10 23:36                                     ` Andrea Parri
2018-03-09  9:48                   ` Lai Jiangshan
2018-03-10 16:06                     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180410234425.GA30784@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox