From: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] tracing/events: block: bring more on a par with blktrace
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 18:36:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180413163623.11282-1-maier@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
I had the need to understand I/O request processing in detail.
But I also had the need to enrich block traces with other trace events
including my own dynamic kprobe events. So I preferred block trace events
over blktrace to get everything nicely sorted into one ftrace output.
However, I missed device filtering for (un)plug events and also
the difference between the two flavors of unplug.
The first two patches bring block trace events closer to their
counterpart in blktrace tooling.
The last patch is just an RFC. I still kept it in this patch set because
it is inspired by PATCH 2/2.
Changes since v1:
[PATCH v2 1/2]
Use 0 and 1 instead of false and true for __print_symbolic table.
Now "trace-cmd report" can decode it. [Steven Rostedt]
Steffen Maier (3):
tracing/events: block: track and print if unplug was explicit or
schedule
tracing/events: block: dev_t via driver core for plug and unplug
events
tracing/events: block: also try to get dev_t via driver core for some
events
include/trace/events/block.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.13.5
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-13 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-13 16:36 Steffen Maier [this message]
2018-04-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tracing/events: block: track and print if unplug was explicit or schedule Steffen Maier
2018-04-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tracing/events: block: dev_t via driver core for plug and unplug events Steffen Maier
2018-04-13 16:36 ` [RFC v2] tracing/events: block: also try to get dev_t via driver core for some events Steffen Maier
2018-04-13 17:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] tracing/events: block: bring more on a par with blktrace Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180413163623.11282-1-maier@linux.ibm.com \
--to=maier@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox