From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754243AbeDPJeq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:34:46 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:56924 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752511AbeDPJep (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:34:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:34:31 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Viresh Kumar , edubezval@gmail.com, kevin.wangtao@linaro.org, leo.yan@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, javi.merino@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, daniel.thompson@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Amit Daniel Kachhap , Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Introduce the cpu idle cooling driver Message-ID: <20180416093431.GA27901@e107533-lin> References: <1522945005-7165-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1522945005-7165-7-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <3f3b3b7a-3b74-aee2-2fac-f2759babe3f0@arm.com> <939f7943-feec-aaa2-3bd3-59a6618330c0@linaro.org> <20180416073729.GA4244@vireshk-i7> <0a3164f9-4738-e24e-6ed0-2c75024c304c@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0a3164f9-4738-e24e-6ed0-2c75024c304c@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 09:44:51AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 16/04/2018 09:37, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 13-04-18, 13:47, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> Ok, noted. At the first glance, it should not be a problem. > > > > Why do you think it wouldn't be a problem ? > > Because we rely on the number to identify the cluster and flag it > 'processed'. The number itself is not important. > In that case, why can't cpu_possible_mask be used for simplicity if all you need is the tracking and that need not be grouped under the "cluster" banner. -- Regards, Sudeep