Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 015/161] printk: Add console owner and waiter logic to load balance console writes

Pavel Machek
2018-04-16T16:54:54Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1920 bytes --]

On Mon 2018-04-16 16:45:16, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:42:30PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >On Mon 2018-04-16 16:39:20, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:28:50PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> >> Is there a reason not to take LED fixes if they fix a bug and don't
> >> >> >> cause a regression? Sure, we can draw some arbitrary line, maybe
> >> >> >> designate some subsystems that are more "important" than others, but
> >> >> >> what's the point?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >There's a tradeoff.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >You want to fix serious bugs in stable, and you really don't want
> >> >> >regressions in stable. And ... stable not having 1000s of patches
> >> >> >would be nice, too.
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't think we should use a number cap here, but rather look at the
> >> >> regression rate: how many patches broke something?
> >> >>
> >> >> Since the rate we're seeing now with AUTOSEL is similar to what we were
> >> >> seeing before AUTOSEL, what's the problem it's causing?
> >> >
> >> >Regression rate should not be the only criteria.
> >> >
> >> >More patches mean bigger chance customer's patches will have a
> >> >conflict with something in -stable, for example.
> >>
> >> Out of tree patches can't be a consideration here. There are no
> >> guarantees for out of tree code, ever.
> >
> >Out of tree code is not consideration for mainline, agreed. Stable
> >should be different.
>
> This is a discussion we could have with in right forum, but FYI stable
> doesn't even guarantee KABI compatibility between minor versions at this
> point.

Stable should be useful base for distributions. They carry out of tree
patches, and yes, you should try to make their lives easy.

Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]