From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752849AbeDRPZl (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:25:41 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60586 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751830AbeDRPZk (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:25:40 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B0DA62178F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=acme@kernel.org Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:25:36 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Dominik Brodowski , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Wang Nan , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/x86: Update syscall trace events to handle new x86 syscall func names Message-ID: <20180418152536.GD10084@kernel.org> References: <20180417130702.01575029@gandalf.local.home> <20180417172236.GA17342@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <20180417180430.GF3625@kernel.org> <20180417181304.GA2895@kernel.org> <20180417174128.0f3457f0@gandalf.local.home> <20180418125322.GB2895@kernel.org> <20180418103606.4118b35f@gandalf.local.home> <20180418150212.GA10084@kernel.org> <20180418151716.GC10084@kernel.org> <20180418112033.65632fef@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180418112033.65632fef@gandalf.local.home> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:20:33AM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:17:16 -0300 > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > This does the trick, by not using the main syscall routine, but one > > called from it and not renamed, should work with older kernels. > > > > This test should be improved to look if the desired routine is in place, > > if not just skip the test and tell about the unavailability of the > > wanted function, but that is for later. > > Does this mean you can give me a "Tested-by" for that last patch? Here it is, just written down: Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo - Arnaldo