From: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] USB: musb: dsps: phy fix and DT-topology support
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:20:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180418162015.GG14921@uda0271908> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180413151505.32663-1-johan@kernel.org>
Johan,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 05:15:02PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> I've been carrying a patch out-of-tree since my work on improving the
> USB device-tree support which is needed to be able to describe USB
> topologies for musb based controllers.
>
> This patch, which associates the platform controller device with the
> glue device device-tree node, did not play well with the recent changes
> which added generic phy support to USB core however.
>
> Like the recent dwc2 regression fixed by Arnd after the device-tree
> #phy-cell changes, the generic phy code in USB core can now also fail
> indefinitly with -EPROBE_DEFER when the controller uses a legacy USB
> phy.
>
> The second patch addresses this for musb, which handles its own (legacy
> and generic) phys, but something more may possibly now be needed for
> other platforms with legacy phys.
>
> In the process of debugging this, I stumbled over another issue which
> caused the dsps legacy phy init two be called twice on every probe and
> which is fixed by the first patch.
>
> Johan
>
>
> Johan Hovold (3):
> USB: musb: dsps: drop duplicate phy initialisation
> USB: musb: host: prevent core phy initialisation
Are the two bugs only affecting you with your out-of-tree patch? It
seems don't have any functional impact for me. I need to make a decision
if these two patches need to go to the stable trees...
Regards,
-Bin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-18 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-13 15:15 [PATCH 0/3] USB: musb: dsps: phy fix and DT-topology support Johan Hovold
2018-04-13 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] USB: musb: dsps: drop duplicate phy initialisation Johan Hovold
2018-04-13 18:45 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-04-13 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] USB: musb: host: prevent core " Johan Hovold
2018-04-13 15:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] USB: musb: dsps: propagate device-tree node Johan Hovold
2018-04-16 20:03 ` Bin Liu
2018-04-17 7:07 ` Johan Hovold
2018-04-18 16:20 ` Bin Liu [this message]
2018-04-18 18:46 ` [PATCH 0/3] USB: musb: dsps: phy fix and DT-topology support Johan Hovold
2018-04-18 18:56 ` Bin Liu
2018-04-18 19:18 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-04-19 7:43 ` Johan Hovold
2018-04-19 21:54 ` Martin Blumenstingl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180418162015.GG14921@uda0271908 \
--to=b-liu@ti.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox