From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753306AbeDUUgJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2018 16:36:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f176.google.com ([209.85.128.176]:39331 "EHLO mail-wr0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753150AbeDUUgI (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2018 16:36:08 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/MkLdNYCjs/qBQ0FFDFT9jxYhO725NGFsWmeEkERpVtz8thJVch1I5caKCw8F9XqFYie3sOg== Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 23:36:04 +0300 From: Alexey Dobriyan To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" Cc: Waiman Long , Linux Kernel Mailing List , rdunlap@infradead.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc/stat: Separate out individual irq counts into /proc/stat_irqs Message-ID: <20180421203604.GB14396@avx2> References: <20180419190846.GE2066@avx2> <1c3b9cf3-3a36-568f-3da2-e560a721f4aa@redhat.com> <20180419195504.GA4343@avx2> <20180419203949.GA4555@avx2> <20180421203422.GA14396@avx2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180421203422.GA14396@avx2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 11:34:22PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:23:02PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > > Can we not just remove per-IRQ stats from /proc/stat (since I gather > > from this discussion it isn't scalable), and just have applications > > that need per-IRQ stats use /proc/interrupts ? > > If you can prove noone is using them in /proc/stat... And you can't even stick WARN into /proc/stat to find out.