Re: [RFC net-next 4/5] net: phy: Add support for IEEE standard test modes

Andrew Lunn
2018-04-30T23:20:56Z

> +/* genphy_set_test - Make a PHY enter one of the standard IEEE defined
> + * test modes
> + * @phydev: the PHY device instance
> + * @test: the desired test mode
> + * @data: test specific data (none)
> + *
> + * This function makes the designated @phydev enter the desired standard
> + * 100BaseT2 or 1000BaseT test mode as defined in IEEE 802.3-2012 section TWO
> + * and THREE under 32.6.1.2.1 and 40.6.1.1.2 respectively
> + */
> +int genphy_set_test(struct phy_device *phydev,
> + struct ethtool_phy_test *test, const u8 *data)
> +{
> + u16 shift, base, bmcr = 0;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Exit test mode */
> + if (test->mode == PHY_STD_TEST_MODE_NORMAL) {
> + ret = phy_read(phydev, MII_CTRL1000);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret &= ~GENMASK(15, 13);
> +
> + return phy_write(phydev, MII_CTRL1000, ret);
> + }

Hi Florain

I looked at the Marvell SDK for PHYs. It performs a soft reset after
swapping back to normal mode. I assume the broadcom PHY does not need
this? But maybe we can add it anyway?

> +
> + switch (test->mode) {
> + case PHY_STD_TEST_MODE_100BASET2_1:
> + case PHY_STD_TEST_MODE_100BASET2_2:
> + case PHY_STD_TEST_MODE_100BASET2_3:
> + if (!(phydev->supported & PHY_100BT_FEATURES))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + shift = 14;
> + base = test->mode - PHY_STD_TEST_MODE_NORMAL;
> + bmcr = BMCR_SPEED100;
> + break;
> +
> + case PHY_STD_TEST_MODE_1000BASET_1:
> + case PHY_STD_TEST_MODE_1000BASET_2:
> + case PHY_STD_TEST_MODE_1000BASET_3:
> + case PHY_STD_TEST_MODE_1000BASET_4:
> + if (!(phydev->supported & PHY_1000BT_FEATURES))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + shift = 13;
> + base = test->mode - PHY_STD_TEST_MODE_100BASET2_MAX;
> + bmcr = BMCR_SPEED1000;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + /* Let an upper driver deal with additional modes it may
> + * support
> + */
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + /* Force speed and duplex */
> + ret = phy_write(phydev, MII_BMCR, bmcr | BMCR_FULLDPLX);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;

Should there be something to undo this when returning to normal mode?

Andrew