From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
johan@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: greybus: Use gpio_is_valid()
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 10:43:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180502084308.GF2285@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c8c96b1971bc09a2a2bfa62c343973ab986aec8.1524889296.git.arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:05:39AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> Replace the manual validity checks for the GPIO with the
> gpio_is_valid().
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> ---
> chnage in v2 :
> Returning invalid gpio as error instead of -ENODEV.
>
> drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c
> index 83254a7..c3a7da5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c
> @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static int arche_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> arche_pdata->svc_reset_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np,
> "svc,reset-gpio",
> 0);
> - if (arche_pdata->svc_reset_gpio < 0) {
> + if (!gpio_is_valid(arche_pdata->svc_reset_gpio)) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset-gpio\n");
> return arche_pdata->svc_reset_gpio;
I'm sorry, but I don't this change is desirable. of_get_named_gpio()
returns a valid gpio number or a negative errno, so there's no need to
use the legacy gpio_is_valid() helper here.
If you grep for of_get_named_gpio() you'll find that some drivers indeed
use that helper this way, but they are in a clear minority.
And ultimately, we want to move to using gpio descriptors anyway.
> }
> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int arche_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> arche_pdata->svc_sysboot_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np,
> "svc,sysboot-gpio",
> 0);
> - if (arche_pdata->svc_sysboot_gpio < 0) {
> + if (!gpio_is_valid(arche_pdata->svc_sysboot_gpio)) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to get sysboot gpio\n");
> return arche_pdata->svc_sysboot_gpio;
> }
> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int arche_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> arche_pdata->svc_refclk_req = of_get_named_gpio(np,
> "svc,refclk-req-gpio",
> 0);
> - if (arche_pdata->svc_refclk_req < 0) {
> + if (!gpio_is_valid(arche_pdata->svc_refclk_req)) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to get svc clock-req gpio\n");
> return arche_pdata->svc_refclk_req;
> }
But if this were to be changed, you'd need to update also the fourth
call to of_get_named_gpio() in this function.
Thanks,
Johan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-02 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-28 4:35 [PATCH v2] staging: greybus: Use gpio_is_valid() Arvind Yadav
2018-04-28 19:58 ` [greybus-dev] " Alex Elder
2018-05-02 5:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-05-02 8:43 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2018-05-02 9:45 ` Arvind Yadav
2018-05-02 9:57 ` Johan Hovold
2018-05-02 10:50 ` Arvind Yadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180502084308.GF2285@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox