From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Satendra Singh Thakur <satendra.t@samsung.com>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hemanshu Srivastava <hemanshu.s@samsung.com>,
Madhur Verma <madhur.verma@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/atomic: Handling the case when setting old crtc for plane
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 13:55:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180503105503.GQ23723@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180503092458.GH12521@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:24:59AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:19:32AM +0530, Satendra Singh Thakur wrote:
> > In the func drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_plane, with the current code,
> > if crtc of the plane_state and crtc passed as argument to the func
> > are same, entire func will executed in vein.
> > It will get state of crtc and clear and set the bits in plane_mask.
> > All these steps are not required for same old crtc.
> > Ideally, we should do nothing in this case, this patch handles the same,
> > and causes the program to return without doing anything in such scenario.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Satendra Singh Thakur <satendra.t@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Madhur Verma <madhur.verma@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Hemanshu Srivastava <hemanshu.s@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > index 7d25c42..5bd3365 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > @@ -1421,7 +1421,9 @@ drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_plane(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
> > {
> > struct drm_plane *plane = plane_state->plane;
> > struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > -
> > + /* Nothing to do for same crtc*/
> > + if (plane_state->crtc == crtc)
> > + return 0;
>
> I didn't do this (both here and in the set_crtc_for_connector functions)
> because the overhead is probably way down in the noise compared to the
> overall atomic commit machinery. Do you really see this as a hotpath?
drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_connector() actually has this since commit
e2d800a3ce1b ("drm: Avoid connector reference imbalance on error path")
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-03 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20180503055008epcas5p2e98aff943c031a90a14df1a85e359d6c@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2018-05-03 5:49 ` [PATCH] drm/atomic: Handling the case when setting old crtc for plane Satendra Singh Thakur
2018-05-03 9:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 10:55 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-05-03 13:33 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180503105503.GQ23723@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=hemanshu.s@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=madhur.verma@samsung.com \
--cc=satendra.t@samsung.com \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox