From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751832AbeEDSdF (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2018 14:33:05 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:34054 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751507AbeEDSdE (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2018 14:33:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 20:32:49 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, Ingo Molnar , "David S. Miller" , Johannes Berg , Alexander Aring , Stefan Schmidt , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, Anna-Maria Gleixner Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] net: mac808211: mac802154: use lockdep_assert_in_softirq() instead own warning Message-ID: <20180504183249.GU12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180504175144.12179-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20180504175144.12179-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180504175144.12179-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 07:51:44PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > From: Anna-Maria Gleixner > > The warning in ieee802154_rx() and ieee80211_rx_napi() is there to ensure > the softirq context for the subsequent netif_receive_skb() call. That's not in fact what it does though; so while that might indeed be the intent that's not what it does.