[PATCH 12/18] time: timer.c: adjust a kernel-doc comment

Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-05-07T09:39:44Z

Those three warnings can easily solved by using :: to indicate a
code block:

./kernel/time/timer.c:1259: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
./kernel/time/timer.c:1261: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
./kernel/time/timer.c:1262: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.

While here, align the lines at the block.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
---
kernel/time/timer.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 4a4fd567fb26..cc2d23e6ff61 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1251,18 +1251,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_to_del_timer_sync);
*
* Note: For !irqsafe timers, you must not hold locks that are held in
* interrupt context while calling this function. Even if the lock has
- * nothing to do with the timer in question. Here's why:
+ * nothing to do with the timer in question. Here's why::
*
* CPU0 CPU1
* ---- ----
- * <SOFTIRQ>
- * call_timer_fn();
- * base->running_timer = mytimer;
- * spin_lock_irq(somelock);
+ * <SOFTIRQ>
+ * call_timer_fn();
+ * base->running_timer = mytimer;
+ * spin_lock_irq(somelock);
* <IRQ>
* spin_lock(somelock);
- * del_timer_sync(mytimer);
- * while (base->running_timer == mytimer);
+ * del_timer_sync(mytimer);
+ * while (base->running_timer == mytimer);
*
* Now del_timer_sync() will never return and never release somelock.
* The interrupt on the other CPU is waiting to grab somelock but
--
2.17.0