Re: [PATCH] kernel/signal: Remove no longer required irqsave/restore

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:49:25PM +0200, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:42:25PM +0200, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Sat, 5 May 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Fri, 4 May 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 11:38:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > > > > (Me, I would run rcutorture scenario TREE03 for an extended time period
> > > > > > > on b4abf91047cf with your patch applied.
> > > > > 
> > > > > And with lockdep enabled, which TREE03 does not do by default.
> > > > 
> > > > Will run that again to make sure.
> > > 
> > > I ran the rcutorture scenario TREE03 for 4 hours with the above
> > > described setup. It was successful and without any lockdep splats.
> > 
> > Thank you for the testing, Anna-Maria!  If you give them a Tested-by,
> > I will give them an ack.  ;-)
> > 
> 
> If it is ok to give a Tested-by to the patch I wrote, I will do this
> to get your ack :)
> 
> Tested-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>

It wasn't even all that early in the morning for me, was it?  ;-)
Anyway:

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

I am sure that you have already considered adding your test results to the
commit log as an alternative to applying a Tested-by to your own patch.

							Thanx, Paul