public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched/fair: schedutil: explicit update only when required
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 18:15:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180510161515.GH12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180510150553.28122-4-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:05:53PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> All the above considered, let's make schedutil updates more explicit in
> fair.c by removing the cfs_rq_util_change() wrapper function in favour
> of the existing cpufreq_update_util() public API.
> This can be done by calling cpufreq_update_util() explicitly in the few
> call sites where it really makes sense and when all the (potentially)
> required cfs_rq's information have been updated.

Aside from having to redraw my ever stale diagrams _again_ I don't think
I object too much here. As you write tracking the exact point where we
did do the update was fairly tedious.

> @@ -5397,9 +5366,27 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>  		update_cfs_group(se);
>  	}
>  
> +	/* The task is visible from the root cfs_rq */
> +	if (!se) {
> +		unsigned int flags = 0;

That one shadows the @flags argument. Some checker is bound to complain
about it.

> +
>  		add_nr_running(rq, 1);
>  
> +		if (p->in_iowait)
> +			flags |= SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * !last_update_time means we've passed through
> +		 * migrate_task_rq_fair() indicating we migrated.
> +		 *
> +		 * IOW we're enqueueing a task on a new CPU.
> +		 */
> +		if (!p->se.avg.last_update_time)
> +			flags |= SCHED_CPUFREQ_MIGRATION;
> +
> +		cpufreq_update_util(rq, flags);
> +	}
> +
>  	hrtick_update(rq);
>  }

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-10 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-10 15:05 [PATCH 0/3] Improve schedutil integration for FAIR tasks Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-10 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/cpufreq: always consider blocked FAIR utilization Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-11  5:44   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-05-11  9:12     ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-14  9:18       ` Vincent Guittot
2018-05-14 16:33         ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-10 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: util_est: update before schedutil Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-10 15:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-11  5:44   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-05-11  8:41     ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-10 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched/fair: schedutil: explicit update only when required Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-10 16:15   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-05-10 16:54     ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-11  5:43   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-05-11  8:42     ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-13  6:04   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-13  6:25     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-14 16:32       ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-15 10:19         ` Vincent Guittot
2018-05-15 14:53           ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-15 16:53             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 17:25               ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-16  7:13               ` Vincent Guittot
2018-05-16  7:12             ` Vincent Guittot
2018-05-16 10:45               ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-05-17 15:17         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-24 13:42           ` Patrick Bellasi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180510161515.GH12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=smuckle@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox