From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752002AbeERGUj (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 02:20:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f170.google.com ([209.85.128.170]:37812 "EHLO mail-wr0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751458AbeERGUi (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 02:20:38 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpikJvJ56GrjMQTNgOY6xUkLJGgLAUpeSf92j55WbQOYcxncBXduXd1ucxcNxG1Dh18+hbYBQ== Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 08:20:34 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Andrew Morton , Steven Rostedt , Laura Abbott , Josef Bacik , Alexei Starovoitov , Ravi Bangoria Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 4/7] kprobes: Ignore break_handler Message-ID: <20180518062034.GB27960@gmail.com> References: <152651499561.25583.14488389770693278906.stgit@devbox> <152651511510.25583.17622383189254834099.stgit@devbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <152651511510.25583.17622383189254834099.stgit@devbox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Ignore break_handler related code because it was only > used by jprobe and jprobe is removed. I changed this description to: ============ Subject: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in generic kprobes code Don't call the ->break_handler() from the core kprobes code, because it was only used by jprobes which got removed. ( In a followup patch we'll remove the remaining calls in low level arch handlers as well and remove the callback altogether. ) ============ Please try to be a lot less vague in changelogs when it's possible and relevant! I.e. saying "Ignore break_handler related code" is annoyingly vague, it doesn't explain things well at all. Saying "Don't call the ->break_handler()" is just as compact, yet it also makes it very clear what's done in the patch... Thanks, Ingo