From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752128AbeERG0o (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 02:26:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com ([209.85.128.196]:44212 "EHLO mail-wr0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751458AbeERG0m (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 02:26:42 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpFKdBBiTgBnM9xiocq+Dqb+HwW4c/K6qMOXW5vOASg4mDtUk0cJ/XBxu9Edz/Fa/kkOdr8AQ== Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 08:26:38 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Andrew Morton , Steven Rostedt , Laura Abbott , Josef Bacik , Alexei Starovoitov , Ravi Bangoria Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 5/7] x86: kprobes: Ignore break_handler Message-ID: <20180518062638.GD27960@gmail.com> References: <152651499561.25583.14488389770693278906.stgit@devbox> <152651514451.25583.15475048007255467863.stgit@devbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <152651514451.25583.15475048007255467863.stgit@devbox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Remove break_handler related code since that was used > only for jprobe and jprobe is removed now. > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu > --- > arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h | 10 ---------- > arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 13 ++----------- > arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c | 16 ++-------------- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) Even after this change there's a stale reference to ->break_handler(): arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h: * a post_handler or break_handler). Please use 'git grep'! Also, there's no reason to send an incomplete series: please remove _all_ ->break_handler() references so that it's 100% gone! The pain of having and not having ->break_handler() is completely unnecessary. Thanks, Ingo