From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752464AbeERUJu (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 16:09:50 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f65.google.com ([209.85.215.65]:38454 "EHLO mail-lf0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752346AbeERUHZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 16:07:25 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpSFef6NxkY3xF2fwip3lUgHFTr2ebwCOFkhrwmMxd0GclLc2HfhKEX3rRVqZI+N+YeFeh6Kg== From: Dmitry Osipenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Geis Subject: [PATCH v2 06/11] cpufreq: tegra20: Remove unneeded check in tegra_cpu_init Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 23:06:37 +0300 Message-Id: <20180518200642.24815-7-digetx@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180518200642.24815-1-digetx@gmail.com> References: <20180518200642.24815-1-digetx@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Remove checking of the CPU number for consistency as it won't ever fail unless there is a severe bug in the cpufreq core. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Acked-by: Thierry Reding --- drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c index ea186d3f0faf..df25e350c8e6 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c @@ -35,8 +35,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = { { .frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END }, }; -#define NUM_CPUS 2 - static struct clk *cpu_clk; static struct clk *pll_x_clk; static struct clk *pll_p_clk; @@ -122,9 +120,6 @@ static int tegra_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { int ret; - if (policy->cpu >= NUM_CPUS) - return -EINVAL; - clk_prepare_enable(cpu_clk); /* FIXME: what's the actual transition time? */ -- 2.17.0