From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752453AbeESN4D (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2018 09:56:03 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f196.google.com ([209.85.161.196]:44165 "EHLO mail-yw0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752403AbeESN4A (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2018 09:56:00 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZo2aF/X8CmEYp+2lW12aBJgGK0FX2rGEXdsz1vdCbSn6a93+NzLOtuYo8OcugrWwmNEZ9lgsQ== Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 09:55:52 -0400 From: William Breathitt Gray To: kbuild test robot Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, jic23@kernel.org, benjamin.gaignard@st.com, fabrice.gasnier@st.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/9] counter: 104-quad-8: Add Generic Counter interface support Message-ID: <20180519135539.GA31866@sophia> References: <881ede525a87ef68fad76cc757ce0ba72df03e5a.1526487615.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> <201805192140.de07sSol%fengguang.wu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201805192140.de07sSol%fengguang.wu@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 09:16:55PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: >Hi William, > >I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > >[auto build test WARNING on linus/master] >[also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc5 next-20180517] >[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] > >url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/William-Breathitt-Gray/Introduce-the-Counter-subsystem/20180519-151353 >reproduce: > # apt-get install sparse > make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig > make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ > > >sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > >>> drivers/counter/104-quad-8.c:803:26: sparse: symbol 'quad8_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? > >Please review and possibly fold the followup patch. Ah, yes it should be static -- looks like I made a minor mistake. I'll squash the fix into the next revision of this patchset. Thank you, William Breathitt Gray > >--- >0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center >https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation