From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751685AbeETOIZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 May 2018 10:08:25 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:52382 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751331AbeETOIY (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 May 2018 10:08:24 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 15:08:06 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Dmitry Osipenko Cc: Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Geis , =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] ARM: trusted_foundations: Implement L2 cache initialization callback Message-ID: <20180520140805.GL17671@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20180520101542.12206-1-digetx@gmail.com> <20180520101542.12206-2-digetx@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180520101542.12206-2-digetx@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 01:15:38PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > Implement L2 cache initialization firmware callback that should be invoked > early in boot to enable cache HW. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko > --- > arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c b/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c > index 3fb1b5a1dce9..198ce5c75ca0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c > +++ b/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c > @@ -18,8 +18,13 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > > +#define TF_CACHE_MAINT 0xfffff100 > + > +#define TF_CACHE_INIT 1 > + > #define TF_SET_CPU_BOOT_ADDR_SMC 0xfffff200 > > #define TF_CPU_PM 0xfffffffc > @@ -63,9 +68,27 @@ static int tf_prepare_idle(void) > return 0; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0 > +static void tf_cache_write_sec(unsigned long val, unsigned int reg) > +{ > + pr_warn("%s: Ignoring write [0x%x]: 0x%08lx\n", __func__, reg, val); Why at warning level? Is this some issue that the user needs to be warned about? -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up