* RE: x86: Fix AMD K6 indirect call check v2
@ 2018-05-21 11:13 tedheadster
2018-05-21 14:10 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: tedheadster @ 2018-05-21 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Andi,
I have a K6 regression testing system. I think my K6 is a revision
C, but I probably can get an earlier cpu (with the bug) to test on.
Do you have any specific tests you would want me to do on the affected cpu?
- Matthew Whitehead
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: x86: Fix AMD K6 indirect call check v2
2018-05-21 11:13 x86: Fix AMD K6 indirect call check v2 tedheadster
@ 2018-05-21 14:10 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2018-05-21 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: whiteheadm; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 07:13:37AM -0400, tedheadster wrote:
> Andi,
> I have a K6 regression testing system. I think my K6 is a revision
> C, but I probably can get an earlier cpu (with the bug) to test on.
>
> Do you have any specific tests you would want me to do on the affected cpu?
You answered to an ancient email? Can barely remember what it was about.
But I think if it still boots it's likely fine.
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-21 14:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-21 11:13 x86: Fix AMD K6 indirect call check v2 tedheadster
2018-05-21 14:10 ` Andi Kleen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox