From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <luto@amacapital.net>,
<mcgrof@kernel.org>, <keescook@chromium.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/2] bpfilter
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 19:22:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180522022230.2492505-1-ast@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi All,
v2->v3:
- followed Luis's suggestion and significantly simplied first patch
with shmem_kernel_file_setup+kernel_write. Added kdoc for new helper
- fixed typos and race to access pipes with mutex
- tested with bpfilter being 'builtin'. CONFIG_BPFILTER_UMH=y|m both work.
Interesting to see a usermode executable being embedded inside vmlinux.
- it doesn't hurt to enable bpfilter in .config.
ip_setsockopt commands sent to usermode via pipes and -ENOPROTOOPT is
returned from userspace, so kernel falls back to original iptables code
v1->v2:
this patch set is almost a full rewrite of the earlier umh modules approach
The v1 of patches and follow up discussion was covered by LWN:
https://lwn.net/Articles/749108/
I believe the v2 addresses all issues brought up by Andy and others.
Mainly there are zero changes to kernel/module.c
Instead of teaching module loading logic to recognize special
umh module, let normal kernel modules execute part of its own
.init.rodata as a new user space process (Andy's idea)
Patch 1 introduces this new helper:
int fork_usermode_blob(void *data, size_t len, struct umh_info *info);
Input:
data + len == executable file
Output:
struct umh_info {
struct file *pipe_to_umh;
struct file *pipe_from_umh;
pid_t pid;
};
Advantages vs v1:
- the embedded user mode executable is stored as .init.rodata inside
normal kernel module. These pages are freed when .ko finishes loading
- the elf file is copied into tmpfs file. The user mode process is swappable.
- the communication between user mode process and 'parent' kernel module
is done via two unix pipes, hence protocol is not exposed to
user space
- impossible to launch umh on its own (that was the main issue of v1)
and impossible to be man-in-the-middle due to pipes
- bpfilter.ko consists of tiny kernel part that passes the data
between kernel and umh via pipes and much bigger umh part that
doing all the work
- 'lsmod' shows bpfilter.ko as usual.
'rmmod bpfilter' removes kernel module and kills corresponding umh
- signed bpfilter.ko covers the whole image including umh code
Few issues:
- the user can still attach to the process and debug it with
'gdb /proc/pid/exe pid', but 'gdb -p pid' doesn't work.
(a bit worse comparing to v1)
- tinyconfig will notice a small increase in .text
+766 | TEXT | 7c8b94806bec umh: introduce fork_usermode_blob() helper
Alexei Starovoitov (2):
umh: introduce fork_usermode_blob() helper
net: add skeleton of bpfilter kernel module
fs/exec.c | 38 ++++++++++---
include/linux/binfmts.h | 1 +
include/linux/bpfilter.h | 15 +++++
include/linux/umh.h | 12 ++++
include/uapi/linux/bpfilter.h | 21 +++++++
kernel/umh.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
net/Kconfig | 2 +
net/Makefile | 1 +
net/bpfilter/Kconfig | 16 ++++++
net/bpfilter/Makefile | 30 ++++++++++
net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/bpfilter/main.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++
net/bpfilter/msgfmt.h | 17 ++++++
net/ipv4/Makefile | 2 +
net/ipv4/bpfilter/Makefile | 2 +
net/ipv4/bpfilter/sockopt.c | 42 ++++++++++++++
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c | 17 ++++++
17 files changed, 503 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/linux/bpfilter.h
create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/bpfilter.h
create mode 100644 net/bpfilter/Kconfig
create mode 100644 net/bpfilter/Makefile
create mode 100644 net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c
create mode 100644 net/bpfilter/main.c
create mode 100644 net/bpfilter/msgfmt.h
create mode 100644 net/ipv4/bpfilter/Makefile
create mode 100644 net/ipv4/bpfilter/sockopt.c
--
2.9.5
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-22 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-22 2:22 Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2018-05-22 2:22 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] umh: introduce fork_usermode_blob() helper Alexei Starovoitov
2018-05-22 2:22 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] net: add skeleton of bpfilter kernel module Alexei Starovoitov
2018-05-23 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 0/2] bpfilter David Miller
2018-05-23 17:33 ` Greg KH
2018-05-24 1:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-05-24 1:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-05-24 2:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180522022230.2492505-1-ast@kernel.org \
--to=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox