linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	byungchul.park@lge.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Peter Zilstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] rcu: Use better variable names in funnel locking loop
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 09:06:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180523160617.GM3803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180523063815.198302-4-joel@joelfernandes.org>

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:38:14PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> 
> The funnel locking loop in rcu_start_this_gp uses rcu_root as a
> temporary variable while walking the combining tree. This causes a
> tiresome exercise of a code reader reminding themselves that rcu_root
> may not be root. Lets just call it rnp, and rename other variables as
> well to be more appropriate.
> 
> Original patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10396577/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>

I used to have double Signed-off-by back when I was seconded to Linaro.
But I am guessing that you want the second and don't need the first
one.  Unless you tell me otherwise, I will remove the first one on
my next rebase.

Anyway, the new variable names are much more clear, good stuff,
queued for further review and testing, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 0ad61c97da69..31f4b4b7d824 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ static void trace_rcu_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
> 
>  /*
>   * rcu_start_this_gp - Request the start of a particular grace period
> - * @rnp: The leaf node of the CPU from which to start.
> + * @rnp_start: The leaf node of the CPU from which to start.
>   * @rdp: The rcu_data corresponding to the CPU from which to start.
>   * @gp_seq_req: The gp_seq of the grace period to start.
>   *
> @@ -1540,12 +1540,12 @@ static void trace_rcu_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
>   *
>   * Returns true if the GP thread needs to be awakened else false.
>   */
> -static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
> +static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp_start, struct rcu_data *rdp,
>  			      unsigned long gp_seq_req)
>  {
>  	bool ret = false;
>  	struct rcu_state *rsp = rdp->rsp;
> -	struct rcu_node *rnp_root;
> +	struct rcu_node *rnp;
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * Use funnel locking to either acquire the root rcu_node
> @@ -1556,58 +1556,58 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
>  	 * scan the leaf rcu_node structures.  Note that rnp->lock must
>  	 * not be released.
>  	 */
> -	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
> -	trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, gp_seq_req, TPS("Startleaf"));
> -	for (rnp_root = rnp; 1; rnp_root = rnp_root->parent) {
> -		if (rnp_root != rnp)
> -			raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
> -		if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp_root->gp_seq_needed, gp_seq_req) ||
> -		    rcu_seq_started(&rnp_root->gp_seq, gp_seq_req) ||
> -		    (rnp != rnp_root &&
> -		     rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp_root->gp_seq)))) {
> -			trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_root, rdp, gp_seq_req,
> +	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp_start);
> +	trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_start, rdp, gp_seq_req, TPS("Startleaf"));
> +	for (rnp = rnp_start; 1; rnp = rnp->parent) {
> +		if (rnp != rnp_start)
> +			raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp);
> +		if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp->gp_seq_needed, gp_seq_req) ||
> +		    rcu_seq_started(&rnp->gp_seq, gp_seq_req) ||
> +		    (rnp != rnp_start &&
> +		     rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq)))) {
> +			trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, gp_seq_req,
>  					  TPS("Prestarted"));
>  			goto unlock_out;
>  		}
> -		rnp_root->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_req;
> -		if (rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq))) {
> +		rnp->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_req;
> +		if (rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp_start->gp_seq))) {
>  			/*
>  			 * We just marked the leaf, and a grace period
>  			 * is in progress, which means that rcu_gp_cleanup()
>  			 * will see the marking.  Bail to reduce contention.
>  			 */
> -			trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, gp_seq_req,
> +			trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_start, rdp, gp_seq_req,
>  					  TPS("Startedleaf"));
>  			goto unlock_out;
>  		}
> -		if (rnp_root != rnp && rnp_root->parent != NULL)
> -			raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
> -		if (!rnp_root->parent)
> +		if (rnp != rnp_start && rnp->parent != NULL)
> +			raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp);
> +		if (!rnp->parent)
>  			break;  /* At root, and perhaps also leaf. */
>  	}
> 
>  	/* If GP already in progress, just leave, otherwise start one. */
>  	if (rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
> -		trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_root, rdp, gp_seq_req, TPS("Startedleafroot"));
> +		trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, gp_seq_req, TPS("Startedleafroot"));
>  		goto unlock_out;
>  	}
> -	trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_root, rdp, gp_seq_req, TPS("Startedroot"));
> +	trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, gp_seq_req, TPS("Startedroot"));
>  	WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags, rsp->gp_flags | RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT);
>  	rsp->gp_req_activity = jiffies;
>  	if (!rsp->gp_kthread) {
> -		trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_root, rdp, gp_seq_req, TPS("NoGPkthread"));
> +		trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, gp_seq_req, TPS("NoGPkthread"));
>  		goto unlock_out;
>  	}
>  	trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_seq), TPS("newreq"));
>  	ret = true;  /* Caller must wake GP kthread. */
>  unlock_out:
>  	/* Push furthest requested GP to leaf node and rcu_data structure. */
> -	if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp_root->gp_seq_needed, gp_seq_req)) {
> -		rnp->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_req;
> +	if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp->gp_seq_needed, gp_seq_req)) {
> +		rnp_start->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_req;
>  		rdp->gp_seq_needed = gp_seq_req;
>  	}
> -	if (rnp != rnp_root)
> -		raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
> +	if (rnp != rnp_start)
> +		raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-23 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-23  6:38 [PATCH 0/4] cleanups, fixes for rcu/dev Joel Fernandes
2018-05-23  6:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] rcu: Speed up calling of RCU tasks callbacks Joel Fernandes
2018-05-23 15:57   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-23 16:45     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-23 17:03       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-23 19:13         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-23 20:04           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-23 21:51             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-24  0:51             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-24  1:35               ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-24 21:47             ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-24 22:38               ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-24 22:42                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-17  9:11                 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Add comment to the last sleep in the rcu tasks loop tip-bot for Steven Rostedt (VMware)
2018-07-17  9:11   ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Speed up calling of RCU tasks callbacks tip-bot for Steven Rostedt (VMware)
2018-05-23  6:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] rcu: Add comment documenting how rcu_seq_snap works Joel Fernandes
2018-05-23 16:04   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-23  6:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] rcu: Use better variable names in funnel locking loop Joel Fernandes
2018-05-23 16:06   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-05-23 19:23     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-24  0:54       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-24  1:27         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-23  6:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] rcu: Identify grace period is in progress as we advance up the tree Joel Fernandes
2018-05-23 16:06   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180523160617.GM3803@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).