From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Cyrus-Session-Id: sloti22d1t05-1900785-1527164456-2-15623088306341652425 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 3.0 X-Spam-known-sender: no X-Spam-score: 0.0 X-Spam-hits: BAYES_00 -1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI -1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI -5, LANGUAGES en, BAYES_USED global, SA_VERSION 3.4.0 X-Spam-source: IP='209.132.180.67', Host='vger.kernel.org', Country='US', FromHeader='org', MailFrom='org' X-Spam-charsets: plain='UTF-8' X-Resolved-to: greg@kroah.com X-Delivered-to: greg@kroah.com X-Mail-from: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=messagingengine.com; s=fm2; t= 1527164455; b=KDQ+p2s59hRlyBapta/5Q25YKUAYbH83wNChBEGPqC3rkO1ddg fbiWcEKJruRqsdse51Dhh8S5LGSZ3JGdhlgX2bjkc82GJQCAz3Ha/zfM/fRKLzty MpHd+IjjOyCh9RrkIi8X/NtwdEttPINWIK/hUy42y+LtlhE2d+If/I4o/UVieCAm rhew/OrGHx0xblo4WMNqT/dIwGwhFw2tDK/pTLhqHPyfZazGwb32O2Ztx/XlSQLp kJW27LI5RwfXOVO9thO+tjag3safOxjV0zyBsf3EUT3eJfGlWK7go6QJdBptakd6 fhUzsIblWoPv/KSlFfE8futZ68cDFI15m1qA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:sender :list-id; s=fm2; t=1527164455; bh=ixZF+Sn9PONBXg+miumgkmAQE3cdbO 0HypHRF+cCeBo=; b=dLXAhdKtKMJ9TqAZh3SuJ7darp/ETsEssn2lc1AiuXlRu6 XOTWosKiBOeWDtod4QxS41nN4gk5VzWRJ0UsLPCJoAHiDzlp/CItd5A/WcOnVazN l0/aJDLQR+6PoOjYXSc3gP2CtvuaB1+kCdLvjgLdGei0Y7C256cod8dUPBdKB4Va 8D7QMMM/zuHrNS/n0oOs1VmeB0vNxsgEe7bT2o38V/SyTqvEJcYcZitHJr0ognYM YSUr/16cVykWDe8Mv+ulRSxdvlmMDgv14PbkDxMFRj9cuHw38M65Aeqad12Qbt6U K44UKW7Lw2Zg+LZ8F6LgUlTKSbb0gYhCGAI8zBPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx2.messagingengine.com; arc=none (no signatures found); dkim=pass (1024-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UP/B1Pgt x-bits=1024 x-keytype=rsa x-algorithm=sha256 x-selector=default; dmarc=none (p=none,has-list-id=yes,d=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org; iprev=pass policy.iprev=209.132.180.67 (vger.kernel.org); spf=none smtp.mailfrom=stable-owner@vger.kernel.org smtp.helo=vger.kernel.org; x-aligned-from=fail; x-cm=none score=0; x-ptr=pass x-ptr-helo=vger.kernel.org x-ptr-lookup=vger.kernel.org; x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=vger.kernel.org smtp.result=pass smtp_org.domain=kernel.org smtp_org.result=pass smtp_is_org_domain=no header.domain=linuxfoundation.org header.result=pass header_is_org_domain=yes; x-vs=clean score=-100 state=0 Authentication-Results: mx2.messagingengine.com; arc=none (no signatures found); dkim=pass (1024-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UP/B1Pgt x-bits=1024 x-keytype=rsa x-algorithm=sha256 x-selector=default; dmarc=none (p=none,has-list-id=yes,d=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org; iprev=pass policy.iprev=209.132.180.67 (vger.kernel.org); spf=none smtp.mailfrom=stable-owner@vger.kernel.org smtp.helo=vger.kernel.org; x-aligned-from=fail; x-cm=none score=0; x-ptr=pass x-ptr-helo=vger.kernel.org x-ptr-lookup=vger.kernel.org; x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=vger.kernel.org smtp.result=pass smtp_org.domain=kernel.org smtp_org.result=pass smtp_is_org_domain=no header.domain=linuxfoundation.org header.result=pass header_is_org_domain=yes; x-vs=clean score=-100 state=0 X-ME-VSCategory: clean X-CM-Envelope: MS4wfMpm3FLAGclbP4rkaaJkhtk/PQNuYpIBgvu56gCGgIrAeaNyW67mGOOLo1sSrAa+ANZnrxPZpDwQNXNylayiQ6hEfOYhooOfs9vKrvE3uB3XJkb294lR nFgEJDcESirDIY8YYXZSizVb4r7ZYhKUhEmdxbBB25+jZkUA9g1E7yD/cqETfM9uYIDWHcGcfSyNQ+0wqCH0rKosTPAt/TG6QBxJnvRdkr+1cxR6HG/G+uL+ X-CM-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=E8HjW5Vl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=UK1r566ZdBxH71SXbqIOeA==:117 a=UK1r566ZdBxH71SXbqIOeA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=VUJBJC2UJ8kA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=J1Y8HTJGAAAA:8 a=ag1SF4gXAAAA:8 a=VliqgAhr-v1-EyMVYEYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=y1Q9-5lHfBjTkpIzbSAN:22 a=Yupwre4RP9_Eg_Bd0iYG:22 X-ME-CMScore: 0 X-ME-CMCategory: none Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966219AbeEXMUh (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 08:20:37 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53320 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966198AbeEXJl2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 05:41:28 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Gopal RajagopalSai , Lance Richardson , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 3.18 09/45] net: support compat 64-bit time in {s,g}etsockopt Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 11:38:17 +0200 Message-Id: <20180524093121.701835354@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180524093120.599252450@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180524093120.599252450@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Lance Richardson [ Upstream commit 988bf7243e03ef69238381594e0334a79cef74a6 ] For the x32 ABI, struct timeval has two 64-bit fields. However the kernel currently interprets the user-space values used for the SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO socket options as having a pair of 32-bit fields. When the seconds portion of the requested timeout is less than 2**32, the seconds portion of the effective timeout is correct but the microseconds portion is zero. When the seconds portion of the requested timeout is zero and the microseconds portion is non-zero, the kernel interprets the timeout as zero (never timeout). Fix by using 64-bit time for SO_RCVTIMEO/SO_SNDTIMEO as required for the ABI. The code included below demonstrates the problem. Results before patch: $ gcc -m64 -Wall -O2 -o socktmo socktmo.c && ./socktmo recv time: 2.008181 seconds send time: 2.015985 seconds $ gcc -m32 -Wall -O2 -o socktmo socktmo.c && ./socktmo recv time: 2.016763 seconds send time: 2.016062 seconds $ gcc -mx32 -Wall -O2 -o socktmo socktmo.c && ./socktmo recv time: 1.007239 seconds send time: 1.023890 seconds Results after patch: $ gcc -m64 -O2 -Wall -o socktmo socktmo.c && ./socktmo recv time: 2.010062 seconds send time: 2.015836 seconds $ gcc -m32 -O2 -Wall -o socktmo socktmo.c && ./socktmo recv time: 2.013974 seconds send time: 2.015981 seconds $ gcc -mx32 -O2 -Wall -o socktmo socktmo.c && ./socktmo recv time: 2.030257 seconds send time: 2.013383 seconds #include #include #include #include #include void checkrc(char *str, int rc) { if (rc >= 0) return; perror(str); exit(1); } static char buf[1024]; int main(int argc, char **argv) { int rc; int socks[2]; struct timeval tv; struct timeval start, end, delta; rc = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, socks); checkrc("socketpair", rc); /* set timeout to 1.999999 seconds */ tv.tv_sec = 1; tv.tv_usec = 999999; rc = setsockopt(socks[0], SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &tv, sizeof tv); rc = setsockopt(socks[0], SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO, &tv, sizeof tv); checkrc("setsockopt", rc); /* measure actual receive timeout */ gettimeofday(&start, NULL); rc = recv(socks[0], buf, sizeof buf, 0); gettimeofday(&end, NULL); timersub(&end, &start, &delta); printf("recv time: %ld.%06ld seconds\n", (long)delta.tv_sec, (long)delta.tv_usec); /* fill send buffer */ do { rc = send(socks[0], buf, sizeof buf, 0); } while (rc > 0); /* measure actual send timeout */ gettimeofday(&start, NULL); rc = send(socks[0], buf, sizeof buf, 0); gettimeofday(&end, NULL); timersub(&end, &start, &delta); printf("send time: %ld.%06ld seconds\n", (long)delta.tv_sec, (long)delta.tv_usec); exit(0); } Fixes: 515c7af85ed9 ("x32: Use compat shims for {g,s}etsockopt") Reported-by: Gopal RajagopalSai Signed-off-by: Lance Richardson Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/compat.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/net/compat.c +++ b/net/compat.c @@ -387,7 +387,8 @@ static int compat_sock_setsockopt(struct if (optname == SO_ATTACH_FILTER) return do_set_attach_filter(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen); - if (optname == SO_RCVTIMEO || optname == SO_SNDTIMEO) + if (!COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME && + (optname == SO_RCVTIMEO || optname == SO_SNDTIMEO)) return do_set_sock_timeout(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen); return sock_setsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen); @@ -452,7 +453,8 @@ static int do_get_sock_timeout(struct so static int compat_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, char __user *optval, int __user *optlen) { - if (optname == SO_RCVTIMEO || optname == SO_SNDTIMEO) + if (!COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME && + (optname == SO_RCVTIMEO || optname == SO_SNDTIMEO)) return do_get_sock_timeout(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen); return sock_getsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen); }