From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>,
Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@gmail.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>,
Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: Per-port setting to use old enumeration scheme
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 18:21:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180524162157.GA26662@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANMq1KD8SpPQ7UTy2wN0J84dsA86Skmbb5q0OjkG+-BZShiv-A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 07:42:00AM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:03:55AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> >> On Wed, 23 May 2018, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> >>
> >> > The "old" enumeration scheme is considerably faster (it takes
> >> > ~294ms instead of ~439ms to get the descriptor).
> >> >
> >> > It is currently only possible to use the old scheme globally
> >> > (/sys/module/usbcore/parameters/old_scheme_first), which is not
> >> > desirable as the new scheme was introduced to increase compatibility
> >> > with more devices.
> >> >
> >> > However, in our case, we care about time-to-active for a specific
> >> > USB device (which we make the firmware for), on a specific port
> >> > (that is pogo-pin based: not a standard USB port). This new
> >> > sysfs option makes it possible to use the old scheme on a single
> >> > port only.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> >> > ---
> >> >
> >> > There are other "quirks" that we could add to reduce further
> >> > enumeration time (e.g. reduce USB debounce time, reduce TRSTRCY
> >> > to 10ms instead of 50ms as used currently), but the logic is quite
> >> > similar, so it'd be good to have this reviewed first.
> >>
> >> I'm not opposed to the idea in principle, although I don't like your
> >> implementation because it breaks the original old_scheme_first
> >> parameter.
>
> I don't think it breaks the original parameter? I mean,
> /sys/module/usbcore/parameters/old_scheme_first is still a global
> default, while bit 0 of /sys/bus/usb/devices/x/y/z/quirks becomes a
> port-specific override.
>
> >> Let's see what some other people think.
> >>
> >> Yours is a rather special case, because you know exactly what device
> >> will be attached to a specific port. Still, I can see that sort of
> >> thing happening in constrained and special-purpose settings.
> >>
> >> How do you arrange to set the new quirk before the device is
> >> discovered?
> >
> > Yeah, this last question is what I had when looking at this. Or does it
> > not matter at first boot and only matters for wake-up?
>
> It does not matter on boot, we have plenty of time to enumerate the
> device. We use USB (auto-)suspend and remote wake, so no
> re-enumeration there either. It only matters on unplug/replug where
> the device needs to be re-enumerated.
How does this device get unplugged/replugged if it is connected directly
to the device?
> Somewhere in an init script, we would do this (we know in advance that
> usb1 port2 is the bus/port where we have our pogo-pin USB interface,
> so we can hard-code the path):
> echo 1 > /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb1/1-0:1.0/usb1-port2/quirks
>
> We could try to add ACPI support (just like connect_type), but we
> don't strictly need it for our application.
Isn't there an "internal" ACPI flag for USB ports, or is that
what connect_type is? Why wouldn't that work here instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-24 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-23 2:16 [PATCH] usb: hub: Per-port setting to use old enumeration scheme Nicolas Boichat
2018-05-23 14:03 ` Alan Stern
2018-05-23 16:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-05-23 23:42 ` Nicolas Boichat
2018-05-24 14:29 ` Alan Stern
2018-05-24 16:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-05-24 22:05 ` Nicolas Boichat
2018-05-25 6:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-05-25 6:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180524162157.GA26662@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=drake@endlessm.com \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=ekorenevsky@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=richard.leitner@skidata.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox