From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Cyrus-Session-Id: sloti22d1t05-4001181-1527262956-2-14527120136109072887 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 3.0 X-Spam-known-sender: no ("Email failed DMARC policy for domain") X-Spam-charsets: plain='us-ascii' X-IgnoreVacation: yes ("Email failed DMARC policy for domain") X-Resolved-to: linux@kroah.com X-Delivered-to: linux@kroah.com X-Mail-from: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=messagingengine.com; s=fm2; t= 1527262956; b=DVm+Zoo40lxc3fzdf4D2f8Yrgcs5uitCzzhSqTBcapqeCty2Af dV9EQDOO/j1+yFn7ehSivDqkpzl2qx8WgZkHoKW0VPmaepJ2LxlGFJHd+LXaevJU dOKfiEfZFFGQ2HsjOpN0WES0LrdkPvDSjNfbwj4KnMijqtq2xz5uxXlYUmjejc3X uitd8bfvjWjRFSL5HR/DDhrcXlur5uWtD1a5gSPjfx4NF9/oM2vYERw9IsDClVTB IbHe6ocACnWU6D7MdV6sS6Pd5dDGjNhFvIzTa9O3MEvIrPyk05BrEYmbue90de+s kR3FZHyCow132nKednDr/UAPy7su3CLyyWrg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to:sender :list-id; s=fm2; t=1527262956; bh=CStK0UH1RnpX9uTTcEevlfRVOWr0v9 jJZpd3xgJJxos=; b=nOCId1nURZz0NQnApKkdu1p/R1B0rSfSJ9uLT4XXjN8PeS xF8+Jn0L8lyS9WU1BAl1GRfLJqbrZ8HivGNtOARlsvMJqGkj6a0zx9GoYpq8T3Ab +spc9GetXICpvFWZiMV+VS/wpcjTTOn2A977vkEYp8DUthxsPer6iNqLdqXG1M4y ETgc1/ZYZDuf2HZ1o1Iz0aZ57DLWjaNW2tfGPMEtfsEjjHK1iR6KHvFzOVPEEBin D+lWF5tOGOFLkl+iqyL/nhq+wovWNjJO96DJb+vnjN6fGgJYXnBa+MyDtd+Mb8lm +8JBuahEKtx3lPoU5wPOMN4X+IRFWbICjfO7FgyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx5.messagingengine.com; arc=none (no signatures found); dkim=none (no signatures found); dmarc=fail (p=none,has-list-id=yes,d=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; iprev=pass policy.iprev=209.132.180.67 (vger.kernel.org); spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org smtp.helo=vger.kernel.org; x-aligned-from=fail; x-cm=none score=0; x-ptr=pass x-ptr-helo=vger.kernel.org x-ptr-lookup=vger.kernel.org; x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=vger.kernel.org smtp.result=pass smtp_org.domain=kernel.org smtp_org.result=pass smtp_is_org_domain=no header.domain=linux.intel.com header.result=pass header_org.domain=intel.com header_org.result=pass header_is_org_domain=no; x-vs=clean score=-100 state=0 Authentication-Results: mx5.messagingengine.com; arc=none (no signatures found); dkim=none (no signatures found); dmarc=fail (p=none,has-list-id=yes,d=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; iprev=pass policy.iprev=209.132.180.67 (vger.kernel.org); spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org smtp.helo=vger.kernel.org; x-aligned-from=fail; x-cm=none score=0; x-ptr=pass x-ptr-helo=vger.kernel.org x-ptr-lookup=vger.kernel.org; x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=vger.kernel.org smtp.result=pass smtp_org.domain=kernel.org smtp_org.result=pass smtp_is_org_domain=no header.domain=linux.intel.com header.result=pass header_org.domain=intel.com header_org.result=pass header_is_org_domain=no; x-vs=clean score=-100 state=0 X-ME-VSCategory: clean X-CM-Envelope: MS4wfGXkohTdcBMVtmToiUBOeE8+pPN0XASpALZZccwZqaRCzlD0h2D+r71aSeW5R6Q7oeqZl9f1lHDMQ4fdLROu3GMJNqqMWDxtc7EsCNCTPEZjuE1f7Yg/ vXiutQYF0M9FPnyfhwUhcvlRpwOBub4GVi22ynBGik4BfC+UaRPg9PdWF8ertIPS4O7NvnRi3qchSAdQ7O23MV0megKvVOe1Y6weWSIaueBQkIBqHc4kt+Gq X-CM-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=NPP7BXyg c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=UK1r566ZdBxH71SXbqIOeA==:117 a=UK1r566ZdBxH71SXbqIOeA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=VUJBJC2UJ8kA:10 a=yPCof4ZbAAAA:8 a=QyXUC8HyAAAA:8 a=wUZLH9Bnd-WLXg72xvsA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-ME-CMScore: 0 X-ME-CMCategory: none Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966130AbeEYPmb (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2018 11:42:31 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:65454 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965570AbeEYPma (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2018 11:42:30 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,440,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="50197259" Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 09:42:29 -0600 From: Ross Zwisler To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Ross Zwisler , Toshi Kani , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, xfs Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] fs: allow per-device dax status checking for filesystems Message-ID: <20180525154229.GA11044@linux.intel.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ross Zwisler , "Darrick J. Wong" , Toshi Kani , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, xfs References: <20180525025518.11405-1-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <20180525025518.11405-2-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <20180525050218.GF4507@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180525050218.GF4507@magnolia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:02:18PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:55:12PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > From: "Darrick J. Wong" > > > > Remove __bdev_dax_supported and change to bdev_dax_supported that takes a > > bdev parameter. This enables multi-device filesystems like xfs to check > > that a dax device can work for the particular filesystem. Once that's > > in place, actually fix all the parts of XFS where we need to be able to > > distinguish between datadev and rtdev. > > > > This patch fixes the problem where we screw up the dax support checking > > in xfs if the datadev and rtdev have different dax capabilities. > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong > > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler > > Reviewed-by: Darr...oh, I'm not allowed to do that, am I? > > Would you mind (re)sending this to the xfs list so that someone else can > review it? > > --D Thanks for the review, Darrick. I think at one point Dave said that if you touch more than 1 filesystem with a series you should just CC linux-fsdevel and omit the individual filesystems? I realize that this series only touches ext2 and ext4 a little, but that's what I opted for. Is that sufficient to get to the rest of the XFS developers, or would you like a resend adding linux-xfs?