Re: [PATCH 9/9] clk: davinci: Fix link errors when not all SoCs are enabled

David Lechner
2018-05-28T16:54:09Z

On 05/28/2018 08:43 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Friday 25 May 2018 11:41 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>> This fixes linker errors due to undefined symbols when one or more of
>> the TI DaVinci SoCs is not enabled in the kernel config.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/clk/davinci/pll.h | 11 ++++++++---
>> drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> drivers/clk/davinci/psc.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>> include/linux/clk/davinci.h | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>> 5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c
>> index 84a343060bc8..65abd371692d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c
>> @@ -860,25 +860,41 @@ static struct davinci_pll_platform_data *davinci_pll_get_pdata(struct device *de
>> }
>>
>> /* needed in early boot for clocksource/clockevent */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
>> CLK_OF_DECLARE(da850_pll0, "ti,da850-pll0", of_da850_pll0_init);
>> +#endif
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id davinci_pll_of_match[] = {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
>> { .compatible = "ti,da850-pll1", .data = of_da850_pll1_init },
>> +#endif
>> { }
>> };
>>
>> static const struct platform_device_id davinci_pll_id_table[] = {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA830
>> { .name = "da830-pll", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)da830_pll_init },
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
>> { .name = "da850-pll0", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)da850_pll0_init },
>> { .name = "da850-pll1", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)da850_pll1_init },
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM355
>> { .name = "dm355-pll1", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)dm355_pll1_init },
>> { .name = "dm355-pll2", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)dm355_pll2_init },
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM365
>> { .name = "dm365-pll1", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)dm365_pll1_init },
>> { .name = "dm365-pll2", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)dm365_pll2_init },
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM644x
>> { .name = "dm644x-pll1", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)dm644x_pll1_init },
>> { .name = "dm644x-pll2", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)dm644x_pll2_init },
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM646x
>> { .name = "dm646x-pll1", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)dm646x_pll1_init },
>> { .name = "dm646x-pll2", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)dm646x_pll2_init },
>> +#endif
>> { }
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.h b/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.h
>> index b2e5c4496645..7cc354dd29e2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.h
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.h
>> @@ -122,14 +122,19 @@ int of_davinci_pll_init(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
>>
>> /* Platform-specific callbacks */
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
>> int da850_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip);
>> void of_da850_pll0_init(struct device_node *node);
>> int of_da850_pll1_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip);
>> -
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM355
>> int dm355_pll2_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip);
>> -
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM644x
>> int dm644x_pll2_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip);
>> -
>> +#endif
>
> The traditional way of dealing with this for functions is to provide a
> static inline stub when CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM644x is not defined. Can
> we use that? That helps in avoiding ifdefs elsewhere.

I suppose we could. But then we would be taking function pointers to
static inline functions, which seems kind of weird to me.

>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM646x
>> int dm646x_pll2_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct regmap *cfgchip);
>> +#endif
>>
>> #endif /* __CLK_DAVINCI_PLL_H___ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
>> index 6326ba1fe3cc..fffbed5e263b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
>> @@ -513,20 +513,34 @@ int of_davinci_psc_clk_init(struct device *dev,
>> }
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id davinci_psc_of_match[] = {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
>> { .compatible = "ti,da850-psc0", .data = &of_da850_psc0_init_data },
>> { .compatible = "ti,da850-psc1", .data = &of_da850_psc1_init_data },
>> +#endif
>> { }
>> };
>>
>> static const struct platform_device_id davinci_psc_id_table[] = {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA830
>> { .name = "da830-psc0", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&da830_psc0_init_data },
>> { .name = "da830-psc1", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&da830_psc1_init_data },
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
>> { .name = "da850-psc0", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&da850_psc0_init_data },
>> { .name = "da850-psc1", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&da850_psc1_init_data },
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM355
>> { .name = "dm355-psc", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&dm355_psc_init_data },
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM365
>> { .name = "dm365-psc", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&dm365_psc_init_data },
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM644x
>> { .name = "dm644x-psc", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&dm644x_psc_init_data },
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM646x
>> { .name = "dm646x-psc", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&dm646x_psc_init_data },
>> +#endif
>> { }
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.h b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.h
>> index c2a7df6413fe..6a42529d31a9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.h
>> @@ -94,15 +94,27 @@ struct davinci_psc_init_data {
>> int (*psc_init)(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base);
>> };
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA830
>> extern const struct davinci_psc_init_data da830_psc0_init_data;
>> extern const struct davinci_psc_init_data da830_psc1_init_data;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
>> extern const struct davinci_psc_init_data da850_psc0_init_data;
>> extern const struct davinci_psc_init_data da850_psc1_init_data;
>> extern const struct davinci_psc_init_data of_da850_psc0_init_data;
>> extern const struct davinci_psc_init_data of_da850_psc1_init_data;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM355
>> extern const struct davinci_psc_init_data dm355_psc_init_data;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM356
>> extern const struct davinci_psc_init_data dm365_psc_init_data;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM644x
>> extern const struct davinci_psc_init_data dm644x_psc_init_data;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM646x
>> extern const struct davinci_psc_init_data dm646x_psc_init_data;
>> +#endif
>
> ifdefs around these extern declarations are not needed.

True. I guess I just prefer a compiler error to a linker error.