From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752674AbeE0XF4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 May 2018 19:05:56 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:49090 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752551AbeE0XFz (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 May 2018 19:05:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 01:05:51 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Gabriel C Cc: LKML , X86 ML , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: smpboot seems to be confused on dual EPYC system Message-ID: <20180527230550.GD6349@zn.tnic> References: <20180527200707.GC6349@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 11:22:18PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > The problem is that being wrong .. > > >[ 0.562171] smpboot: Max logical packages: 4 > > These are max 2 not 4. So the whole "problem" is that it miscounts max packages. Which means we waste a couple of KBs of memory, tops. Any other, real problems you're experiencing? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.