public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, tj@kernel.org,
	jolsa@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] perf: Sharing PMU counters across compatible events
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 13:15:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180528111549.GA3452@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180504231102.2850679-3-songliubraving@fb.com>

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:11:02PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> Connection among perf_event and perf_event_dup are built with function
> rebuild_event_dup_list(cpuctx). This function is only called when events
> are added/removed or when a task is scheduled in/out. So it is not on
> critical path of perf_rotate_context().

Why is perf_rotate_context() the only critical path? I would say the
context switch path is rather critical too.

> @@ -2919,8 +3014,10 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>  
>  	if (ctx->task) {
>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuctx->task_ctx != ctx);
> -		if (!ctx->is_active)
> +		if (!ctx->is_active) {
>  			cpuctx->task_ctx = NULL;
> +			rebuild_event_dup_list(cpuctx);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/*

> +static void rebuild_event_dup_list(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> +{
> +	int dup_count = cpuctx->ctx.nr_events;
> +	struct perf_event_context *ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx;
> +	struct sched_in_data sid = {
> +		.ctx = ctx,
> +		.cpuctx = cpuctx,
> +		.can_add_hw = 1,
> +	};
> +
> +	if (ctx)
> +		dup_count += ctx->nr_events;
> +
> +	kfree(cpuctx->dup_event_list);
> +	cpuctx->dup_event_count = 0;
> +
> +	cpuctx->dup_event_list =
> +		kzalloc(sizeof(struct perf_event_dup) * dup_count, GFP_ATOMIC);


__schedule()
  local_irq_disable()
  raw_spin_lock(rq->lock)
  context_switch()
    prepare_task_switch()
      perf_event_task_sched_out()
        __perf_event_task_sched_out()
	  perf_event_context_sched_out()
	    task_ctx_sched_out()
	      ctx_sched_out()
	        rebuild_event_dup_list()
		  kzalloc()
		    ...
		      spin_lock()

Also, as per the above, this nests a regular spin lock inside the
(raw) rq->lock, which is a no-no.

Not to mention that whole O(n) crud in the scheduling path...

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-28 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-04 23:11 [RFC 0/2] perf: Sharing PMU counters across compatible events Song Liu
2018-05-04 23:11 ` [RFC 1/2] perf: add move_dup() for PMU sharing Song Liu
2018-05-04 23:11 ` [RFC 2/2] perf: Sharing PMU counters across compatible events Song Liu
2018-05-28 11:15   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-05-28 18:24     ` Song Liu
2018-05-28 11:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-28 18:19     ` Song Liu
2018-05-28 11:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-28 11:33   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180528111549.GA3452@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox