From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, tj@kernel.org,
jolsa@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] perf: Sharing PMU counters across compatible events
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 13:15:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180528111549.GA3452@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180504231102.2850679-3-songliubraving@fb.com>
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:11:02PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> Connection among perf_event and perf_event_dup are built with function
> rebuild_event_dup_list(cpuctx). This function is only called when events
> are added/removed or when a task is scheduled in/out. So it is not on
> critical path of perf_rotate_context().
Why is perf_rotate_context() the only critical path? I would say the
context switch path is rather critical too.
> @@ -2919,8 +3014,10 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>
> if (ctx->task) {
> WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuctx->task_ctx != ctx);
> - if (!ctx->is_active)
> + if (!ctx->is_active) {
> cpuctx->task_ctx = NULL;
> + rebuild_event_dup_list(cpuctx);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> +static void rebuild_event_dup_list(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> +{
> + int dup_count = cpuctx->ctx.nr_events;
> + struct perf_event_context *ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx;
> + struct sched_in_data sid = {
> + .ctx = ctx,
> + .cpuctx = cpuctx,
> + .can_add_hw = 1,
> + };
> +
> + if (ctx)
> + dup_count += ctx->nr_events;
> +
> + kfree(cpuctx->dup_event_list);
> + cpuctx->dup_event_count = 0;
> +
> + cpuctx->dup_event_list =
> + kzalloc(sizeof(struct perf_event_dup) * dup_count, GFP_ATOMIC);
__schedule()
local_irq_disable()
raw_spin_lock(rq->lock)
context_switch()
prepare_task_switch()
perf_event_task_sched_out()
__perf_event_task_sched_out()
perf_event_context_sched_out()
task_ctx_sched_out()
ctx_sched_out()
rebuild_event_dup_list()
kzalloc()
...
spin_lock()
Also, as per the above, this nests a regular spin lock inside the
(raw) rq->lock, which is a no-no.
Not to mention that whole O(n) crud in the scheduling path...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-28 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-04 23:11 [RFC 0/2] perf: Sharing PMU counters across compatible events Song Liu
2018-05-04 23:11 ` [RFC 1/2] perf: add move_dup() for PMU sharing Song Liu
2018-05-04 23:11 ` [RFC 2/2] perf: Sharing PMU counters across compatible events Song Liu
2018-05-28 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-05-28 18:24 ` Song Liu
2018-05-28 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-28 18:19 ` Song Liu
2018-05-28 11:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-28 11:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180528111549.GA3452@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox