From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932451AbeE2If4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2018 04:35:56 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:37634 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932270AbeE2Ifx (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2018 04:35:53 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJctgSmmfuSu36vgju6PGCN6G9qzXpGOaEUE/ovqElhMuhp1qCQ10HoleQrbb8r96hzFB0HwA== From: Matti Vaittinen X-Google-Original-From: Matti Vaittinen Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 11:35:41 +0300 To: Lee Jones Cc: Matti Vaittinen , mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, mazziesaccount@gmail.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikko.mutanen@fi.rohmeurope.com, heikki.haikola@fi.rohmeurope.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] mfd/regulator/clk: bd71837: ROHM BD71837 PMIC driver Message-ID: <20180529083541.GA13528@localhost.localdomain> References: <20180528090003.GA8778@localhost.localdomain> <20180529073958.GB4790@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180529073958.GB4790@dell> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:39:58AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 28 May 2018, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > > Patch series adding support for ROHM BD71837 PMIC. > FYI, this patch-set is going to be difficult to manage since it was > not sent 'threaded'. > > If/when you send a subsequent version, could you please ensure you > send the set threaded so the patches keep in relation to one another > as they are reviewed? Thanks for the guidance. I have not sent so many patches to community so I am grateful also from all the practical tips =) Just one slight problem. I have only seen emails being threaded when one is replying to an email. So how should I send my patches in same thread? Just send first one and then send subsequent patches as replies? I just killed some unused definitions and one unused variable from the code so I am about to send new version. I'll try doing that as a threaded series and resend all the patches as v3. Br, Matti Vaittinen