Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf: add boot parameters for sysctl knobs

Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2018-05-24T07:41:20Z

On Wed, 23 May 2018 15:02:45 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:18:19PM +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> > Some BPF sysctl knobs affect the loading of BPF programs, and during
> > system boot/init stages these sysctls are not yet configured.
> > A concrete example is systemd, that has implemented loading of BPF
> > programs.
> >
> > Thus, to allow controlling these setting at early boot, this patch set
> > adds the ability to change the default setting of these sysctl knobs
> > as well as option to override them via a boot-time kernel parameter
> > (in order to avoid rebuilding kernel each time a need of changing these
> > defaults arises).
> >
> > The sysctl knobs in question are kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disable,
> > net.core.bpf_jit_harden, and net.core.bpf_jit_kallsyms.
>
> - systemd is root. today it only uses cgroup-bpf progs which require root,
> so disabling unpriv during boot time makes no difference to systemd.
> what is the actual reason to present time?
>
> - say in the future systemd wants to use so_reuseport+bpf for faster
> networking. With unpriv disable during boot, it will force systemd
> to do such networking from root, which will lower its security barrier.
> How that make sense?
>
> - bpf_jit_kallsyms sysctl has immediate effect on loaded programs.
> Flipping it during the boot or right after or any time after
> is the same thing. Why add such boot flag then?
>
> - jit_harden can be turned on by systemd. so turning it during the boot
> will make systemd progs to be constant blinded.
> Constant blinding protects kernel from unprivileged JIT spraying.
> Are you worried that systemd will attack the kernel with JIT spraying?

I think you are missing that, we want the ability to change these
defaults in-order to avoid depending on /etc/sysctl.conf settings, and
that the these sysctl.conf setting happen too late.

For example with jit_harden, there will be a difference between the
loaded BPF program that got loaded at boot-time with systemd (no
constant blinding) and when someone reloads that systemd service after
/etc/sysctl.conf have been evaluated and setting bpf_jit_harden (now
slower due to constant blinding). This is inconsistent behavior.

--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer