From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932183AbeE3Teo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 30 May 2018 15:34:44 -0400
Received: from mail-qt0-f193.google.com ([209.85.216.193]:35137 "EHLO
        mail-qt0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753627AbeE3Tej (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 30 May 2018 15:34:39 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKI/hqiiN5lnBVcCYgukV5PaT5K04Q1z2IhsotcShvwfmU2544K/zh1/O3/5O4o2w800EDm8Iw==
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 15:34:35 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, colyli@suse.de,
        darrick.wong@oracle.com, clm@fb.com, bacik@fb.com,
        linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
        linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
        neilb@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] convert block layer to bioset_init()/mempool_init()
Message-ID: <20180530193435.GC3487@kmo-pixel>
References: <20180521144703.GA19303@redhat.com>
 <4b343aef-e11c-73ba-1d88-7e73ca838cad@kernel.dk>
 <20180521150439.GA19379@redhat.com>
 <61e30dcf-a01c-f47d-087a-12930caf9aef@kernel.dk>
 <20180521151817.GA19454@redhat.com>
 <d01a150a-7752-f6ce-78f2-17a65c1e6fa5@kernel.dk>
 <20180521160907.GA19553@redhat.com>
 <f9e3714c-b7c9-d5f6-4018-2a87dd5babb2@kernel.dk>
 <20180530133629.GC5157@redhat.com>
 <f654ad69-aa90-9580-4731-a05d0604f353@kernel.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f654ad69-aa90-9580-4731-a05d0604f353@kernel.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:55:48PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/30/18 7:36 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > So revisiting this patchset: are you inclined to take these changes (I
> > assume yes)?  If so, what would you need in order to get them staged for
> > 4.18?  I'll start with offering my review in reply to the DM patch.  I'd
> > much prefer to see this level of change go in sooner rather than later.
> 
> Yeah I'd like to take the changes, but we might have to wait for
> 4.19 at this point. It'd certainly help to have the dm bits reviewed,
> as they are some of the larger ones. The grunt of the others are mostly
> trivial and smaller in scope.

I don't have a strong opinion on 4.18 vs. 4.19, but I'm available to do whatever
fixups are needed if it'll help get them in faster.