From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932477AbeE3Vr5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2018 17:47:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:43229 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932395AbeE3Vry (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2018 17:47:54 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKn6blmoAJPi4gf3KGZAjY8mset/m3IaYgU2QcxVqYVm7Mhc3okWRN/MDA1Y2Vt2vMTXsCcJQ== Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 14:47:50 -0700 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Vignesh R Cc: Grygorii Strashko , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] Input: ti_am335x_tsc - Mark IRQ as wakeup capable Message-ID: <20180530214750.GD203327@dtor-ws> References: <20180424062741.7891-1-vigneshr@ti.com> <20180424062741.7891-2-vigneshr@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180424062741.7891-2-vigneshr@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Vignesh, On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:57:39AM +0530, Vignesh R wrote: > On AM335x, ti_am335x_tsc can wake up the system from suspend, mark the > IRQ as wakeup capable, so that device irq is not disabled during system > suspend. > > Signed-off-by: Vignesh R > --- > v3: Drop unneeded device_may_wakeup() check > > drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c > index f1043ae71dcc..3908c21862c7 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > > @@ -432,6 +433,10 @@ static int titsc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto err_free_mem; > } > > + err = dev_pm_set_wake_irq(tscadc_dev->dev, ts_dev->irq); > + if (err) > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "irq wake enable failed.\n"); > + Looking at this driver some more: why do we have the parent MFD device as wakeup source? It seems we have 2 independent interrupt lines, one in IIO and one in input and we could actually have the touchscreen itself to be one of the wakeup devices? I.e. i'd expect err = dev_pm_set_wake_irq(&pdev->dev, ts_dev->irq); here and we should be checking the touchscreen pdev in suspend/resume when checking whether to program the controller for wakeups. > titsc_writel(ts_dev, REG_IRQENABLE, IRQENB_FIFO0THRES); > titsc_writel(ts_dev, REG_IRQENABLE, IRQENB_EOS); > err = titsc_config_wires(ts_dev); > @@ -462,6 +467,7 @@ static int titsc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > > err_free_irq: > + dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(tscadc_dev->dev); > free_irq(ts_dev->irq, ts_dev); > err_free_mem: > input_free_device(input_dev); > @@ -474,6 +480,7 @@ static int titsc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct titsc *ts_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > u32 steps; > > + dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(ts_dev->mfd_tscadc->dev); > free_irq(ts_dev->irq, ts_dev); > > /* total steps followed by the enable mask */ > -- > 2.17.0 > Thanks. -- Dmitry